Player is loading...

Embed

Embed code is not allowed

This talk is part of a  Private webcast, embeding is not permited.

Transcriptions

Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:01
mm kay morning everyone uh you know a a one and the second one also uh
00:00:12
and also a bit on this uh the first thing i want to tell you about is our aim at that position
00:00:18
of an anatomical coordinate system for the radius in three d.
00:00:20
imaging and we tested the reliability of automatic menu placements
00:00:26
uh but fierce uh first clinicians whining from bother about the radio coordinate system
00:00:32
was actually calming use you see it uh when you have
00:00:35
a really smell you and you have three surgical planning
00:00:39
um then you express the uh repositioning parameters in
00:00:43
a with regard to this coordinate system
00:00:46
or when talk about forty croaking magic's you position a cornet system on the rate is
00:00:53
and you express the motion of the cardinals with respect to discordant
00:00:58
system in about this uh for basically will be my next
00:01:03
uh but what is the problem well uh between hospitals and also
00:01:08
between research you see difference can thanks of the radius
00:01:11
um and we want to know if that actually matters in positioning discordant
00:01:16
system because we want a unilateral positioning so we can compare research
00:01:21
uh it's this was the for this does the image length of
00:01:24
the radius significant effects the position are of this government's is
00:01:29
what we did was we took eighty five l. c. completely scan rainy i
00:01:34
yeah we systematically shorten them instead of ten percent uh with our own uh some late software
00:01:40
uh and we that physicians man replace accorded system and
00:01:45
also we're a computerised everything position the court system
00:01:50
then we uh took a gold standard across the gold standard was a completely scan radius in which
00:01:57
the uh automatic placement position the corn system and then we looked at the error in positioning
00:02:04
this is for example impair you get when you only have ten percent of the radius net
00:02:10
and the automatic positioning positions important system then what you see is
00:02:14
you get a translation error so the point of insertion changes
00:02:19
and you also get a rotation arrow so here you see the exact this that axes
00:02:24
no points throughout the sign up process uh and for example
00:02:28
the y. axis is completely shifted one eighty degrees
00:02:33
so we compared uh the uh accuracy imposition of positioning
00:02:38
of the automatic menu placement and d. r. results
00:02:42
uh the subject is with what you see is on the left crossed the translation or rotation error
00:02:47
and on the y. axis you have the translation or rotation are in millimetres or degrees
00:02:53
on the x. axis you have the radio length and from ten
00:02:57
centimetres that short on to one percent completely scan breeze
00:03:02
and what you see is for translation error that uh with manual placements
00:03:07
uh it doesn't matter how long the baby is is
00:03:11
the uh menu placement there is approximately two millimetres
00:03:15
then uh when you look at the rotation error you see
00:03:18
that for seventy two ninety percent uh there's a difference
00:03:22
um in the dispersion for that that's these are the hatch there
00:03:28
i'm in favour of the automatic placement in only ninety percent
00:03:31
also the difference in the median is statistically significant
00:03:35
but uh for the rest a doctor pretty good at correcting this rotation air
00:03:41
and you see if there's only ten percent that we out for a a computer
00:03:46
uh therefore in conclusion if you have a short scamper yes uh
00:03:50
less than twenty percent recording system should be placed a manually
00:03:55
uh and you always take it i got it yet is two millimetre of translation error
00:04:00
uh and when you're more and ability to a position with an algorithm
00:04:05
you should try to position it with a a computerised basement

Conference Program

A-0267 Carpal Alignment: A New Method for Assessment
C.A. Selles 1, L. Ras 1, M.M.J. Walenkamp 1, M. Maas 2, J.C. Goslings 1, N.W.L. Schep 3, 1 Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2 Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 3 Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherland
June 14, 2018 · 7:59 a.m.
A-1076 The scapholunate gap increases with forearm supination. A laboratory study.
Mireia Esplugas 1, Guillem Salvà-Coll 2,3, Marc Garcia-Elias 4, Alex Lluch-Bergadà 4,5, Manuel Llusá-Pérez 6, Spain
June 14, 2018 · 8:07 a.m.
A-0047 How Reliable is the Radiographic Diagnosis of Mild Madelung Deformity?
Sebastian Farr 1, Thierry G. Guitton 2, David Ring 3, Science of Variation Group, 1 Orthopedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria; 2 University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands; 3 Dell Medical School - The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
June 14, 2018 · 8:17 a.m.
A-0206 Comparison of Contact and Non-contact Ultrasound Examination of the Hand
Rebecca Lim 1, Chin Shu Ting 2, Chan Kai Li 2, Abby Choke 1, Tay Shian Chao 1,2, Duncan Angus McGrouther 1,2, 1 Department of Hand Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; 2 Biomechanics Laboratory, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
June 14, 2018 · 8:25 a.m.
A-0876 Diagnosis of hand and forearm fractures in whole body CT after polytrauma
Friederike Mu?nn 1, Andreas Eisenschenk 1,2, Martin Lautenbach 3, Tobias Topp 3, Simon Kim 1, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Germany; 2 Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Germany; 3 Krankenhaus Waldfriede Berlin, Germany
June 14, 2018 · 8:40 a.m.
A-0630 Assessment of scaphoid fracture patterns using a 3D-CT model
Gernot Schmidle, Rohit Arora, Markus Gabl, Department for Trauma Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
June 14, 2018 · 8:48 a.m.
297 views
A-1113 CT-scans alter treatment in 33% of scaphoid fractures deemed undisplaced by conventional x-rays
Johannes Heindl 1, Jesper Sonntag 2, Per Rasmussen 2, Per Hølmer 2, Birgit Waschulzik 3, Claus Hjorth Jensen 4, Anders Klahn 2, 1 Lakumed Clinic Landshut-Achdorf, Germany; 2 Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; 3 Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Munich, Germany; 4 Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark
June 14, 2018 · 8:58 a.m.
A-0766 Toward standardization of an anatomical coordinate system for the radius in 3D imaging: reliability of automatic and manual placement
Marieke GA de Roo 1,2, Johannes GG Dobbe 2, Geert J Streekstra 2, Simon D Strackee 1, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
June 14, 2018 · 9:06 a.m.
A-0759 Analysis of interfragmentary motion in scaphoid fractures by 4-dimensional computed tomographic imaging
Marieke GA de Roo 1,2, Johannes GG Dobbe 2, Geert J Streekstra 2, Simon D Strackee 1, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
June 14, 2018 · 9:16 a.m.
A-0998 Dynamic MRI at 3T can determine the viability of the lunate bone in patients with Kienböck’s disease
Anders Björkman 1, Sven Månsson 2, Markus F. Mu?ller 3, Martin Johansson 4, Gunilla Mu?ller 3, Departments of 1 Hand Surgery, 2 Medical Radiation Physics, 3 Radiology and 4 Pathology Department of Translational Medicine (1-4), Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
June 14, 2018 · 9:42 a.m.