Player is loading...

Embed

Embed code is not allowed

This talk is part of a  Private webcast, embeding is not permited.

Transcriptions

Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
action and then things really make a call here this morning like talk
00:00:03
to you about a new method the for measuring cup alignments
00:00:08
and
00:00:11
why i think it is funny because uh we've seen uh there's a relationship
00:00:16
between radiological rendered and functional outcome it's always a big debate whether
00:00:21
they're related or not hand one of these radiological parameters used is a
00:00:27
couple alignments although it's not one of the most frequent ones used
00:00:30
and then when this method is used there's always also discussion how should we met measure corporal alignment
00:00:38
and even though some studies of already said that corporal line is
00:00:41
one of the only predictors uh for a functional outcome
00:00:46
so in two thousand eleven this article was of a published which that this is which is now the most commonly
00:00:52
used method for a measuring cup alignment where you draw a line along that axis uh of the kept eight
00:00:58
and along a line along the radial shaft and when these two lines cross within the corpus we
00:01:04
say that we have carpal alignments but this method is not always as easy to reproduce
00:01:11
so we uh did a study and we wanted to look at the intern internal server variability
00:01:17
new uh that but because of the perpendicular method and we wanted to compare it to the
00:01:21
existing method and also wanted to look at the normal distribution of corporal alignment in
00:01:27
the breasts of an fractured around and fractured race
00:01:32
so how did we do this we did a retrospective the artificial study we looked at all consecutive adult patients
00:01:38
with this'll radius fractures type a and type c. with that fifty fractured race and fifty and fractured ribs
00:01:46
nelson cubic through uh this method and it's based on
00:01:50
uh using the line of louis describe the
00:01:53
several years ago and where you draw a a line along and the folder cortex
00:02:00
and you keep continuing this line and it says if you if you're
00:02:04
line crosses the centre of the cats it's you've got carpal alignment
00:02:08
so what does it look like but we compare both methods with each other we see
00:02:12
using the existing method the white lines for you cross the two lines and you
00:02:17
see that the cross and the cat in the corpus it says you should have couple
00:02:21
lyman only look at our method for each other's liner long oval or cortex
00:02:26
you can actually see it doesn't cost centres that kept it so that we believe that actually you have some now alignments and
00:02:32
with this method you can also quantify your mouth alignment so in
00:02:36
this case there was the mel alignment of eight millimetres
00:02:41
so we did not measurements for both the the existing method in the new
00:02:45
method uh by three independent reviewers and and with the injury entrap
00:02:50
server variability uh where what from excellent to pour correlation and then we
00:02:56
look for the normal distribution as well and these and fractured race
00:03:01
so we look at our right in terms or variability we
00:03:05
see every existing method it's quite high or zero
00:03:08
point eighty nine zero point six three and zero point six by the three observers with the new method
00:03:15
even higher zero point ninety six zero point eighty eight zero point seven you too
00:03:21
and then we look at what is quite alignment in and i'm fractured race is the rest and with the cops always online
00:03:28
we see that according to the most commonly used method right now there
00:03:31
was only carpal mime in about fifty nine percent of the patients
00:03:36
and with the other method the perpendicular method we found a couple lines in the seventy nine percent of patients
00:03:44
what this distribution look my of uh of the alignments you see in the normal rates most
00:03:50
of the base work are the aligned around zero but it had the
00:03:54
standard deviation of two and half millimetres fuller and dorsal displacement
00:04:00
what are the advantages as well about this method uh when taking
00:04:04
a radio grass roots positioning is always a a factor
00:04:07
but because of the correlation between the dollar cortex in the cat if we believe uh you don't really have this problem
00:04:14
so we took some pictures in various degrees of the race uh ten degrees zero degrees minus ten degrees
00:04:20
and here you see despite different angles of taking your radio crap you still
00:04:25
have a you're still able to measure the carpal alignments so the way
00:04:29
of taking a picture doesn't really uh impact uh your measurement
00:04:35
and but you all is not also have the rest positioning in here we looked
00:04:39
if you flex or the expenditure raced if you still have corporal alignments
00:04:44
uh and and you actually see here the red line that
00:04:47
no matter what service position this is the same raced
00:04:52
once you have purple line and you hold in different positions are you take it in different angles you still
00:04:57
have this carpal alignments and so this meant that because i think the relationship with each other um
00:05:04
is a lot easier to reproduce
00:05:07
so uh i think you'd actually this perpendicular method we believe it's in new repeat useful method for measuring
00:05:13
carpal lyman it takes away a lot of the disadvantages
00:05:16
of risk positioning a radio graph uh techniques
00:05:20
and you're also able to um quantifier measure of uh over the amount of now alignment
00:05:27
and believe that the next step is the testing this new method and seeing what

Conference Program

A-0267 Carpal Alignment: A New Method for Assessment
C.A. Selles 1, L. Ras 1, M.M.J. Walenkamp 1, M. Maas 2, J.C. Goslings 1, N.W.L. Schep 3, 1 Trauma Unit, Department of Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 2 Department of Radiology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; 3 Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, the Netherland
June 14, 2018 · 7:59 a.m.
A-1076 The scapholunate gap increases with forearm supination. A laboratory study.
Mireia Esplugas 1, Guillem Salvà-Coll 2,3, Marc Garcia-Elias 4, Alex Lluch-Bergadà 4,5, Manuel Llusá-Pérez 6, Spain
June 14, 2018 · 8:07 a.m.
A-0047 How Reliable is the Radiographic Diagnosis of Mild Madelung Deformity?
Sebastian Farr 1, Thierry G. Guitton 2, David Ring 3, Science of Variation Group, 1 Orthopedic Hospital Speising, Vienna, Austria; 2 University Medical Center, Groningen, The Netherlands; 3 Dell Medical School - The University of Texas, Austin, TX, USA
June 14, 2018 · 8:17 a.m.
A-0206 Comparison of Contact and Non-contact Ultrasound Examination of the Hand
Rebecca Lim 1, Chin Shu Ting 2, Chan Kai Li 2, Abby Choke 1, Tay Shian Chao 1,2, Duncan Angus McGrouther 1,2, 1 Department of Hand Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore; 2 Biomechanics Laboratory, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
June 14, 2018 · 8:25 a.m.
A-0876 Diagnosis of hand and forearm fractures in whole body CT after polytrauma
Friederike Mu?nn 1, Andreas Eisenschenk 1,2, Martin Lautenbach 3, Tobias Topp 3, Simon Kim 1, Universitätsmedizin Greifswald, Germany; 2 Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Germany; 3 Krankenhaus Waldfriede Berlin, Germany
June 14, 2018 · 8:40 a.m.
A-0630 Assessment of scaphoid fracture patterns using a 3D-CT model
Gernot Schmidle, Rohit Arora, Markus Gabl, Department for Trauma Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
June 14, 2018 · 8:48 a.m.
297 views
A-1113 CT-scans alter treatment in 33% of scaphoid fractures deemed undisplaced by conventional x-rays
Johannes Heindl 1, Jesper Sonntag 2, Per Rasmussen 2, Per Hølmer 2, Birgit Waschulzik 3, Claus Hjorth Jensen 4, Anders Klahn 2, 1 Lakumed Clinic Landshut-Achdorf, Germany; 2 Nordsjaellands Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark; 3 Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Munich, Germany; 4 Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital of Copenhagen, Denmark
June 14, 2018 · 8:58 a.m.
A-0766 Toward standardization of an anatomical coordinate system for the radius in 3D imaging: reliability of automatic and manual placement
Marieke GA de Roo 1,2, Johannes GG Dobbe 2, Geert J Streekstra 2, Simon D Strackee 1, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
June 14, 2018 · 9:06 a.m.
A-0759 Analysis of interfragmentary motion in scaphoid fractures by 4-dimensional computed tomographic imaging
Marieke GA de Roo 1,2, Johannes GG Dobbe 2, Geert J Streekstra 2, Simon D Strackee 1, Academic Medical Center (AMC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
June 14, 2018 · 9:16 a.m.
A-0998 Dynamic MRI at 3T can determine the viability of the lunate bone in patients with Kienböck’s disease
Anders Björkman 1, Sven Månsson 2, Markus F. Mu?ller 3, Martin Johansson 4, Gunilla Mu?ller 3, Departments of 1 Hand Surgery, 2 Medical Radiation Physics, 3 Radiology and 4 Pathology Department of Translational Medicine (1-4), Lund University, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
June 14, 2018 · 9:42 a.m.