Transcriptions
Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
missus sherman and dick leaks are happy not to talk about three d. scaffold fracture assessment
00:00:07
after some background information about talk about our researches topic with the first study being
00:00:12
a study 'cause comparing the ability of two d. and three d. imaging
00:00:17
to an alliance sky a stability to know lice big tele t. and the fact that happens as a whole
00:00:23
and the second study concerning with mel rotation of discomfort and mainly it's clinical relevance
00:00:30
so what is our main goal our main goal is to tax discovery to heal and in the best
00:00:35
case in an atomic position to avoid to long term consequences of pasta try to some pain
00:00:41
and for that we need the imaging to really display the truth of the fracture
00:00:45
the truth that we uh long to use for our indications for surgery
00:00:50
and also to achieve then the favourably results we long for
00:00:55
what is to the imaging able to do to the imaging gives us very good information
00:00:59
about capping it gives of information about mel alignment in second so increment line
00:01:05
it misses some fractal patterns it's not the complete picture as
00:01:09
discovered itself is a three dimensional um uh stuff
00:01:13
so the three d. imaging gives us now this ability to see all the fracture pens to
00:01:19
penalise it very easy and fast without a lot of training maybe even and especially
00:01:25
some parents liked rotational mel alignment this certain mention of no
00:01:29
positioning is only visible in these three d. imaging methods
00:01:33
so as a clinician i want to know which kind of imaging modality do i need to get the information necessary
00:01:39
and for that we compare the sixty nine consecutive patients um fit with
00:01:44
a forty five fractures in twenty four non unions in their ability
00:01:48
to distinguish exactly those parameters and we started with the fact you
00:01:53
get with the two d. c. t. b. no reference then
00:01:56
and we saw that uh only forty nine percent of the x. rays were really getting it's the same information as
00:02:02
to to d. c. t. so there was a gap of agreement more than in the three d. city
00:02:07
but when we look at it threshold clinical relevant threshold that we use for the case
00:02:12
surgery it was that lead it's one and the treatment in only
00:02:16
eight point seven percent or two point nine percent respectively
00:02:20
over treatment um as a surgeon is never a problem we treat it so
00:02:25
fracture location now reviewed of with this three d. c. t. s. a reference
00:02:29
standard showed that again the x. rays that's the worst agreement rates
00:02:34
and it was especially true when the when more than one so it's involved in in the factor
00:02:39
and when there was an involvement of the critical proximal poll so for these cases x-rays just not helpful
00:02:47
and the part of the analysis of a three d. excels is when
00:02:51
we go for the fact of course for the fractal plane
00:02:54
that we see you know good uh agreement not needed for the x. rays no for the to the city
00:03:00
and we see the coral plane being in fifty percent utterance was practically
00:03:05
and in the secular plane we see in over seventy percent of the cases that
00:03:09
the fractures nasty buttons thirty degrees and this is clinically valid rather relevant
00:03:14
because the steeper dangle the harder it is to fix was the single screw it on the central axis
00:03:21
one part we also ready this d. s. l. ligament um and especially that also attachment of it
00:03:28
because as long as we have a soft tissue attachment to our proximal fragment
00:03:32
some plots applies likely and we uh distinguished in in three regions
00:03:38
the red rabbit we have a complete connection we have the red white and
00:03:42
red uh and the white white somewhere there's possible on no connection
00:03:46
and we saw that the fractures uh mainly the red rats and the non unions mainly in the red white and white white sounds
00:03:55
i mean i'll go for the meditation uh we did a study
00:03:57
in saudi seven patients but we analysed notation compared it
00:04:02
to the treatment modality that we applied and to bone healing fracture h.
00:04:08
we saw that the cases we treat its operative to operate to flee
00:04:12
or that we treated conservatively but much lower no alignment rate
00:04:16
and those that we could not we construct anymore so it somehow seems to be a measure of instability
00:04:22
when we look for um and uh the healing rate itself it gives descriptive this the yeah distinguishing
00:04:29
but the at the end uh two two little numbers to really give us significant values
00:04:34
that's another case when we talk about factor age we saw
00:04:37
that non unions have significantly higher rates of mel rotation
00:04:41
so somehow to some extent it seems to be a part of the normal staff with a nonunion history
00:04:47
but also fifteen percent of the prime rib fractures had not rotation of more than five degrees
00:04:52
so to sum it up to somehow information um a three d. analyses gives us additional information that is it
00:05:00
specially relevant when we go for treatment planning for pretty
00:05:04
operative planning how to use our an implant
00:05:08
and especially information about the fact of clean and its relation to anatomical relevant landmarks
00:05:13
can give us additional information on stability but also on the vitality of the fragments
00:05:19
and meditation is quite frequent and this frequency makes it's
00:05:24
um more likely that we should address it
00:05:26
to restore scaffold anatomy and so possible couple alignment