Transcriptions
Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:02
yeah the purpose of this study was to evaluate the final
00:00:06
outcome of their alert status of if he ever constructions
00:00:09
and also to compare those results with goals of profound to stand under construction in the thing 'cause
00:00:14
one hundred and seventy two patients underwent or construction of i.
00:00:18
b. l. tent unless rated in zones one and two
00:00:22
sixty four patients what you get into a good setting within the first twenty four hours after injury
00:00:26
and in one hundred f. eight cases so she was before and after several weeks ago only one man steely
00:00:33
um we used low forum little um after slight sedation at one hour before surgery
00:00:42
mm ins on one the l. advancement was considered as a treatment of choice it was
00:00:47
carried out in nineteen eighty cases with this post dumplings no more than twelve millimetres
00:00:52
proximal tandem and maybe found either got some of how things work see no level
00:00:58
into into and later construction cases if the advancement
00:01:02
was also successfully found the proximal tandem l.
00:01:06
and the should be found it proximal findings level and that was really
00:01:10
possible in about fifty percent and so one uh late cases
00:01:16
in they get don't to laceration cases a. b. l. prime crafting procedure
00:01:21
was performed in twenty five patients and proximal tended and may be
00:01:26
found at a senior level as well as at low program level
00:01:31
about every time we used only shorted to plant grass procedure
00:01:37
second to low stand out as a source of craft was used and
00:01:41
here you can see some motion at one week after surgery
00:01:45
in eighteen patients primary in this f. d. s. transfer to f. p. l. as a tent and was performed
00:01:52
and proximal f. b. l. stamp unsuited to transfer that indexed and then in the till four am as a mortar
00:01:58
at the right you can see for approaches you need for index eddie extra chance huh
00:02:04
in a sixty five late he says conventional single stage f.
00:02:09
p. l. draft from second to extend the was performed
00:02:13
approximate and of the tandem of good condition and mobile t. should be found gets you know
00:02:18
level and keep the problem with that was used in on most of the patients
00:02:25
uh_huh twenty two patients were treated by two stage of construction
00:02:30
and you know patients only little cheap to forum implant was used
00:02:35
at the second stage figured after c. g. using second to extend the tandem was
00:02:39
carried out in thirteen patients and also wanted to forum route was used
00:02:45
actually you can see in a finger flexion at a these after stage too
00:02:50
and in seven patients in text and p. s. two s. p. l. transfer with f.
00:02:55
b. l. proximal and switching the more to add a little one level was performed
00:03:00
if the functional outcomes so clinically maybe you could control lap examination at six months after
00:03:06
surgery in one hundred and thirty four sounds makes a seventy eight percent of pieces
00:03:14
fifty three percent that made it is excellent and i would like to
00:03:19
interviews some excellent pieces h. p. l. advancement in the eighteen city
00:03:25
late if he'll advancement h. p. l. primer grafting procedure done
00:03:31
a primary index l. d. s. transfer to f. b. l. s. attendant
00:03:35
was proximal f. p. l. stamps you to to transfer tandem at the morton
00:03:41
two cases of conventional single stage if they are but i think the best one um uh
00:03:47
results at a two and a half months after surgery and the second one
00:03:51
you can see the results after twenty three years that just searching and that last late in that's
00:03:57
anti as transferred to l. a. l. as a tendon oh was proximal f. p. else um
00:04:04
stamps future to transfer to index at and then in the diesel forum is immortal and so what
00:04:10
do you want to own more tissue during no patience learning to use the transfer was needed
00:04:16
um there was no significant difference in the nato
00:04:19
excellent outcomes and in rapture eight also
00:04:23
uh between the some room and our previously reported single stage
00:04:27
grafting who all one hundred and thirty two fingers
00:04:32
so to conclude our practical experience suggests at the f. b.
00:04:37
l. advancement to be highly effective in that make it
00:04:40
city put someone lacerations as well as for late surgery
00:04:44
cases and it wasn't too if b. l. injuries
00:04:48
primary crafty they could setting conventional single stationarity tuesday should
00:04:53
construction and index and yes to f. l. transfer
00:04:57
with all proximal and usually hold provide reasonably good outcomes was low complication rates
00:05:03
thank you for your kind attention how
00:05:09
hi i just got home right one comment because we are tight time now
00:05:16
that was a great presentation but i have a question most
00:05:19
people use the transfer of superficial so i'm more more
00:05:24
ring finger using index finger it's the first time i've seen like it makes more sense because it's closer
00:05:32
but do you think there's it's a better transfer the morgan ring and why
00:05:38
is the index superficial this better than wong and bring transfer and
00:05:44
yes i consider that that is better because i'm in low
00:05:48
forum uh it lies so quite close to them in
00:05:53
so that's a plus islam was and um we needs you during the
00:05:57
proximal stamp this is a a very convenient way to do it
00:06:03
more convenient that uh for long tendon
00:06:09
are there any disadvantage use for when they're texting we're
00:06:13
using a smart phones with your index finger
00:06:17
no i never noticed