Transcriptions
Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
okay thank you for the introduction
00:00:05
so the background of the study is that we think uh that conventional radio grass are
00:00:10
uh unreliable and insufficient in the classification of skateboard a weight factors
00:00:16
and uh the the choice of treatment uh of these uh uh regress
00:00:21
uh computes marker fee has been playing to be the
00:00:24
tool of choice when determining factor displacement and uh
00:00:28
fact a displacement this uh maybe one of the most important factor is uh in fact revealing
00:00:35
so the purpose of the study is to determine the inter rater reliability and
00:00:39
integrated beep visibility in the classification and that the
00:00:43
choice of treatment in a skip always fractures
00:00:47
the rate of population uh consisted out of the of the peak surgeons with
00:00:51
a particular interest in hand surgery they're all working at our department
00:00:57
so we had fifty one scapegoat way factors with c. t. scans
00:01:02
and a seven independent of the p. d. surgeons uh they look at all the scans
00:01:07
they classified each factor in uh on this place fractures list into millimetre displacement or more
00:01:12
than two millimetre displacement and they suggested the treatment of a four weeks remotely station
00:01:18
uh maybe a controversial but uh four weeks a mobile station
00:01:21
eight to twelve weeks mobile station and uh operation
00:01:26
this could be a simplified just to look at the the factors that was
00:01:31
a classified less than two millimetre displays the more than two millimetre
00:01:34
and uh uh the factors that were uh suggested to be treated
00:01:38
non operative lee or uh with o. production so fixation
00:01:44
so based on the first round of classification we were able
00:01:47
to calculate the inter rater reliability meaning how well each
00:01:51
surgeon agree with each other and uh we did this both for the classification and the choice of treatment
00:01:59
based on the second round classification we uh we
00:02:02
could calculate the integrated reproduce ability meaning how
00:02:06
well each surgeon agreed with themself both for the classification and that the choice of treatment
00:02:13
and uh these uh demographics are base that on the first round of uh
00:02:18
uh both uh classification and and treatment and we see that uh about
00:02:23
thirty eight percent of the the fractures or classified as on displaced
00:02:27
forty percent more than or less than a two millimetre displaced
00:02:31
and the twenty percent a modern term limits placed
00:02:35
for the treatment uh about eighty percent or suggest it should be
00:02:38
treated conservatively and uh about twenty percent uh uh operate
00:02:45
and so for the inter rater reliability how well the the surgeons
00:02:49
agree with each other uh we calculate the kappa value
00:02:53
and uh the kappa value was interpreted or translated by land dissing cock a distracted agreement
00:02:59
and uh when you have the the three different uh classification groups and displaced a less than two millimetre all
00:03:06
more than two minute display structures the kappa value was a point five to translate to moderate agreement
00:03:13
when you simplify the classification system you get an increase in the kappa
00:03:17
value which is expected and it just met a substantial criteria
00:03:23
uh in choosing the treatment that we saw a a fairly low kappa value
00:03:28
of a point three uh eight uh um translated to just fair agreement
00:03:34
but when a simplifying the the choice of treatment to the casting versus
00:03:39
open adoption some fixation the kappa value increased as we
00:03:42
expected and uh then it's worse moderate agreement
00:03:48
so looking at the incinerator reproduce ability so the looking at
00:03:53
how well each surgeon agreed with themselves what they said
00:03:56
one week earlier um we saw substantial agreement on all parameters and
00:04:01
increasing kappa values when simplifying both the classification system nor the choice of treatment
00:04:10
so in conclusion to this uh that was substantially inter rater reliability when uh in in
00:04:16
classification between last into media displays the fractures and more than two millimetre space lectures
00:04:22
uh but only moderate inter rater reliability when choosing between an operative treatment or operative treatment
00:04:29
the inter rater rip disability was a substantial the agreement on all parameters
00:04:35
uh and uh both both for the classification and the choice of treatment
00:04:40
so in the future we recommend for the training of surgeons before we will introduce the
00:04:45
routine of c. c. both for the classification fractures and and the choice of treatment
00:04:51
thank you much how
00:05:00
are there any questions
00:05:06
well you said you had that i'm surgeons and have you looked at
00:05:11
different as well so are there you are working right more experience
00:05:17
but we yeah we we try to look at this uh um there were some surgeons with a lot of experience and
00:05:24
younger surgeons with less experience and we didn't uh uh like an
00:05:29
over test for to see if if any of the surgeons
00:05:33
did better or worse than the other and there were no different the twenty surgeons