Player is loading...

Embed

Copy embed code

Transcriptions

Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
thank you i hope you can hear me it to just to be clear ideas subplot to federal administration
00:00:06
but i i'm not gonna speak today about the federal
00:00:10
administration as a regulator gonna speak by the federal administration
00:00:14
as an organisation that uses a i and the our some challenges did too and um
00:00:23
you you are in the fast moving world of set to go away i
00:00:28
um i i assume a day's suspect
00:00:33
things go let's quickly within the federal administration
00:00:38
but they have a they have been a few things going on and i just thought i'd give you these point is at least
00:00:45
you've heard about but it was a reporting twenty nineteen which seems really will now
00:00:50
when you think of it but uh that was produced within the federal administration about
00:00:54
the sort of the state of a. r. i. in switzerland not only within the
00:00:59
public sector but everywhere what needs to be done with several action points for different uh
00:01:05
uh domains et cetera so a few things were done
00:01:09
internally and within the administration one of them uh was
00:01:14
to create a competence centre for data signs that said
00:01:17
this reschedule statistical office to having truman competence put it aside
00:01:23
and a i as a tool as well of course uh
00:01:26
guidelines wait sure it's a maybe a city they are um
00:01:31
but not mandatory they um i capital but we'll pass your but they do
00:01:35
exist and it's for a human centred use of a i kind of the tools
00:01:42
and uh uh uh what's interesting more interesting directly interesting to me is the
00:01:46
creation of the i. c. n. a. i. in twenty twenty one and uh uh
00:01:53
maybe you know all will have heard about it in the media or not but didn't for november
00:01:59
last year so there is now an on an on got
00:02:02
this ongoing work to look at what kind of regulatory approaches would
00:02:08
be suitable for switzerland yeah when it comes to a i looking
00:02:11
at europe as well et cetera so the whole analysis is ongoing
00:02:15
nobody knows which directions gonna go and the results of this
00:02:21
this examination of possibilities uh will come at the end of the year
00:02:26
internally as well so does not everybody but there is a a working
00:02:30
group when they are within the administration it's trends departmental and they're looking
00:02:37
at more directly what needs to be done for the who does what's
00:02:40
the use of a i a government that that you're within the administration
00:02:45
and uh we actually use the web site of the sunni i to publish some uh um
00:02:50
something's produced by this group such as a fact sheet on the
00:02:55
use of jenny i wouldn't get ministrations or you might have seen
00:02:59
in the news or not but i ongoing work we're back to this you know yeah i saw that was with the um
00:03:06
there's federal statistical office got division mandate in twenty twenty one to create this network
00:03:13
uh you go running review more more in the first part of twenty two
00:03:19
it's in network it was a conscience choice can because uh
00:03:25
the report showed that there was some may but nobody wanted to
00:03:30
create a pray for a big central institution and they also agreed on the fact that
00:03:37
you couldn't do nothing so this was way in
00:03:40
the middle and network was a set up and that
00:03:45
so oh it's it is it has to be a touch somewhere
00:03:49
administratively so it belongs to the swiss pedals that it's got office
00:03:53
but it's meant as an enabler and that's a lot tighter and work to put
00:03:57
together compact competencies that exist across the administration
00:04:01
but we do provide some based services such
00:04:05
as a terminology so you can it's all on the c. n. a. i don't
00:04:10
swiss website which is updated before christmas so for in german the other languages are coming
00:04:16
um to try to have a common language um and we try to stay in line with o.
00:04:23
e. c. d. definitions of course and we are in touch with people when negotiating internationally so it
00:04:29
but we don't do a wrong thing you know corner that would be a bad idea and the most such
00:04:34
a prominent thing i think in terms of democracy transparency and what role will give a few examples is this
00:04:41
list of a. i. projects that we maintain that database it's not mandatory nobody has
00:04:47
to announce projects to us but it was really meant as a to showcase and
00:04:52
on the one hand show citizens look that's what we starting to do and also within the administration to
00:04:59
did not have redundancy is the key people can work together so that's the other aspect of course
00:05:06
it's knowledge sharing a specialist sharing and um
00:05:11
to have a sort of a network of expertise
00:05:14
and they're uh this takes more time but it's a network so setup competence happens to that
00:05:21
we are facilitators but when they are specific questions
00:05:24
for example relating to legal questions around the use of
00:05:28
a a high within the administration not really you drafting a new laws but the use of existing regulation
00:05:35
how do they apply to but they i to being used
00:05:38
for example in an interview does questions got to illegal hot
00:05:43
but that the responsibility for that is that for example that uh
00:05:47
in the department of foreign affairs and uh with some preview states are
00:05:52
collaborating day as well and then we have a competence of algorithm
00:05:56
this is mainly my colleagues from the data signs competence centre and um
00:06:02
we're hoping to expand with uh_huh your collaborations with economic
00:06:06
sector of course so we and that's why uh that
00:06:11
that's i think that is important message especially in today's context is work
00:06:17
it's key values and especially related to that database but less the project very low tech and it's a p.
00:06:23
d. f. we get quite a few messages oh very
00:06:27
angry people saying that it's not machine readable and uh
00:06:31
uh yes please be my guess vote for budgets we can do it differently but um
00:06:37
it was just that and i think in the contest
00:06:41
last year was extremely intense in terms of a parliamentary various
00:06:46
questions in the parking problem in about a guy what
00:06:49
is the pendulum instruction doing how we gonna do with regulation
00:06:52
so it's so turn out that it was actually quite good to be able to show okay it's
00:06:56
not complete but we we which when we train together who does what and what is being done uh
00:07:04
and yeah i think can visits and that works so it's really supposed to
00:07:09
to hell with little means to try to achieve as much knowledge exchange as possible
00:07:15
try at least uh i think high don't need to convince
00:07:21
this audience that a i can help him in different situations
00:07:25
and why would the the administration use a i i think that's very
00:07:29
similar to any business when the organisation um
00:07:34
now in an administration this is specific focus when have new
00:07:38
insights you might wanna use it for decision making holy see policymaking
00:07:44
but of course it is always a dual more with less less budget more chores more
00:07:50
more more more more communication or maybe saws
00:07:55
and everybody needs to increase efficiency so that's really
00:08:00
but i think that's not a very surprising and of course especially the g. p. t. now
00:08:06
chad but we're gonna solve all our problems and the people will be able to concentrate
00:08:10
on the true test if we have a male bought a chat but something can help citizens
00:08:15
but then responsibility comes in how i i think one main difference though is that this
00:08:21
these questions was too personal you see them everyday we're gonna solve everything with a i but
00:08:27
it's more than just rhesus assessment for a public administration it's
00:08:32
it's more than allah not if you lose the trust of the citizen with a few
00:08:37
citizens uh you is extremely hard to to get it back and in the implications of
00:08:43
responsibility for the chat but that tells you it's gonna rain with age
00:08:47
percent likelihood and uh it doesn't okay i took my brother for nothing
00:08:52
if you have a chat but setup that will answer you in which uh administrative
00:08:58
it fits you gotta follow if you need a permit of
00:09:01
something and it's actually wrong was responsible and this is not even
00:09:05
but it was k. so i think this makes it particularly sensitive and i'm
00:09:11
of course we have to think about that i think it's extremely important and i think
00:09:15
it's a two important that this if with power keeping up my own of a a a
00:09:22
just very quickly the the i mean it's not complete this list then will be updated probably my pro uh
00:09:28
i'm about seventy projects so most ongoing not not all
00:09:33
uh if you have a look at it you'll see that
00:09:37
then if you are actually in production most of the and then there is that on this list are indeed
00:09:44
peas proof of concepts people trying things out because also
00:09:48
the lingo frame with not always ready but at least
00:09:52
could we use it would it be useful would actually make it saves time
00:09:57
because that's a question to you wanna save money saved time but sometimes you end up
00:10:01
seeing that it's not that easy you have to take what will drift into account will actually
00:10:06
did you have to compute power it's a trip that's more later then yes it down projects
00:10:10
from almost all departments if you familiar with that
00:10:14
seven uh it departments plus the chance to read
00:10:18
ongoing and there's a lot of research going on it unless use some not sure if you collaborate demonstrates but uh
00:10:25
so that contributes to this very high columns of projects from their side they really
00:10:30
do a lot of research on a. i. n. various implications not only warfare or um
00:10:38
just quickly yeah why do we use it new insights increasing efficiency
00:10:43
it's actually more less fifty fifty because of the say this is a lot of research going
00:10:47
on uh i must use that skews the graph more or less a little bit and uh
00:10:53
was the target audience with very often it's more likely to
00:10:58
work right the output of the system will be used by um
00:11:02
but collaborate is for something or in another process sometimes it's external professionals from a
00:11:08
certain uh the main uh and for example maps or uh you know with the
00:11:14
or other authorities pretty seen this is probably supposed to it but but in the room
00:11:21
and the general public here meetings use for example i'm sure examples just uh i
00:11:28
think you're very familiar with what a i can do would not sometimes it's like that
00:11:32
detection of binge drinking cartels these uh uh uh
00:11:35
this is actually production come cool it's an extension
00:11:39
of work that's been done until now but with better tools and also international collaboration in this case
00:11:46
uh this is a local example from our uh of
00:11:49
face a statistic that used to take twelve he used to
00:11:53
complete because if it is the the to fake on the
00:11:56
usage of um of the grammar right if it's agricultural naught
00:12:02
done with aerial photographs taken over every cool
00:12:05
tool it take its use and the um
00:12:09
the evaluation of the pictures used to be a hundred percent
00:12:12
manual between people so now part of it is done with a
00:12:16
deep neural net with system and a device to harvest the
00:12:20
time it was also good use case to show and then following
00:12:24
what we do and actually stolen i think i don't have to
00:12:27
tell you you know it an ultimate decision of classification of holland particles
00:12:34
an i. r. system this is the new but this is our definition
00:12:38
on this in the eye but it's like the o. e. c. d. uh
00:12:42
definition so it is it has an l. model and it is it has an effect on the environment
00:12:48
and they are specific challenges and i wanna finish on that for
00:12:52
a public administration the model itself can be a very simple integration
00:12:56
can be a bit more complicated maybe random force that can be
00:12:59
a true black box right did neural networks we don't really understand so
00:13:04
why are there specific challenges related to that's i think really
00:13:10
data we can be scraped from the net uh it and mister deeds beta but
00:13:15
they they can be biased what about the quality the security privacy uh no surprise that
00:13:23
was projects are in production a. i. r. based on our personal data non personal like that sorry
00:13:30
and intellectual property of course let's see uh and of course and the computing that's a bit
00:13:37
what about sovereignty where do the models rhyme because if
00:13:40
the uh compute hungry and we usually within the administration we
00:13:45
don't really have the resources to make a by do we um does the powers imagery and do
00:13:52
we have internal competence as well i think the the human factors will is really important you can have
00:13:57
fantastic tools but if the uh i collaborate just don't now what they're working with uh don't know
00:14:03
if that actually a lot to challenge the result of the automated system that was so expensive to build
00:14:09
uh well they really do it and there are many under pressure to do more with less
00:14:14
do yeah yeah when you walk two miles you know that you have it you have a
00:14:18
a little you choose your last function or maybe there is an implicit objective but still she
00:14:24
the result choice somewhere what's acceptable in terms of a curiously might be some percentages might
00:14:30
be okay for the main population but benny for some good boarded tolerable people it's not
00:14:37
uh and really the black box comes with a lot of problems in terms of legal terms as well
00:14:44
you had as a public administration do g. t. to
00:14:47
let the big window to to justify your decision so
00:14:51
how do you choose complexity versus explained ability trace
00:14:55
ability interpret ability these um mean important points and it's
00:14:59
less sensitive probably with the non personal data
00:15:03
uh such as ah pollen particles don't really mind
00:15:07
but for other things the these are extremely important questions and at the
00:15:10
end of the day such a system has an effect on the environment
00:15:14
on rule of law we live in a democracy and on fundamental rights
00:15:18
because how do you what effect it had on your twenty of someone you've
00:15:23
if a decision made the decision is not even automatic but the
00:15:28
mere fact that it was suggested by a machine this automation by its

Share this talk: 


Conference Program

Opening and introduction
Prof. Lonneke van der Plas, Group Leader at Idiap, Computation, Cognition & Language
Feb. 21, 2024 · 9 a.m.
101 views
Democracy in the Time of AI: The Duty of the Media to Illuminate, Not Obscure
Sara Ibrahim, Online Editor & Journalist for the public service SWI swissinfo.ch, the international unit of the Swiss Broadcasting Corporation
Feb. 21, 2024 · 9:15 a.m.
AI in the federal administration and public trust: the role of the Competence Network for AI
Dr Kerstin Johansson Baker, Head of CNAI Unit, Swiss Federal Statistical Office
Feb. 21, 2024 · 9:30 a.m.
Automated Fact-checking: an NLP perspective
Prof. Andreas Vlachos, University Cambridge
Feb. 21, 2024 · 9:45 a.m.
DemoSquare: Democratize democracy with AI
Dr. Victor Kristof, Co-founder & CEO of DemoSquare
Feb. 21, 2024 · 10 a.m.
Claim verification from visual language on the web
Julian Eisenschlos, AI Research @ Google DeepMind
Feb. 21, 2024 · 11:45 a.m.
Generative AI and Threats to Democracy: What Political Psychology Can Tell Us
Dr Ashley Thornton, Geneva Graduate Institute
Feb. 21, 2024 · noon
Morning panel
Feb. 21, 2024 · 12:15 p.m.
AI and democracy: a legal perspective
Philippe Gilliéron, Attorney-at-Law, Wilhelm Gilliéron avocats
Feb. 21, 2024 · 2:30 p.m.
Smartvote: the present and future of democracy-supporting tools
Dr. Daniel Schwarz, co-founder Smartvote and leader of Digital Democracy research group at IPST, Bern University of Applied Sciences (BFH)
Feb. 21, 2024 · 2:45 p.m.
Is Democracy ready for the Age of AI?
Dr. Georges Kotrotsios, Technology advisor, and former VP of CSEM
Feb. 21, 2024 · 3 p.m.
Fantastic hallucinations and how to find them
Dr Andreas Marfurt, Lucerne University of Applied Sciences and Arts (HSLU)
Feb. 21, 2024 · 3:15 p.m.
LOCO and DONALD: topic-matched corpora for studying misinformation language
Dr Alessandro Miani, University of Bristol
Feb. 21, 2024 · 3:30 p.m.
Afternoon panel
Feb. 21, 2024 · 3:45 p.m.