Transcriptions
Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
good afternoon uh yes i'm an integrated in this is a pickering
00:00:04
isn't doing this talk he's doing my clinic beckoning and
00:00:07
i'm pleased to say so on doing the talking stud so this is instability that we've measured and some uh
00:00:15
thoughts on it technically
00:00:19
um so yeah you jane's abilities recognise increasingly common it's complex
00:00:24
by mechanics and there's been suggested that different positions is the wrist in
00:00:29
for all will um tighten or loosen the d. r. u. j.
00:00:35
so we do about race reading um this is the third incarnation you should have seen the first it was
00:00:42
very primitive and so we're able to simulate the chemical testing of d. r. u. j. she yeah
00:00:49
and we can do it in probation super nation radio non deviation
00:00:54
we can't completely control for rotation of the radius related to
00:00:58
the on that um and that's a limitation of this
00:01:03
so that's the rig as we use it when we tested it on could obvious we previously probably set work we say that this is
00:01:09
um reliable and valid so the meshes we got we think are pretty jane you in and
00:01:14
they fit without the clinical measurements so we've compared them to our sounded c. t. based
00:01:20
is that people down and they look very similar to the so this is to really show you what
00:01:26
the data really is and then we can extract the landing points from its own the normal population
00:01:32
uh the writes the same as the left on surprisingly there's a pretty consistent range
00:01:36
this was in four hundred and ten limbs we've now done over five hundred
00:01:40
and the ranges from four to nine millimetres okay that nines
00:01:44
quite an important point okay so it's pretty consistent
00:01:49
and it's pretty consistent between men and women is a little bit more in maine and we've now started measuring for on length
00:01:55
'cause maintain the bigger than women and there's a degree
00:01:58
proportionality so essentially most people are pretty similarly stable
00:02:04
uh then we tested the positions and it has been suggested that you put your wrist into only deviation
00:02:09
then that makes the d. r. u. j. less stable for that's wrong every position makes the d. r. u.
00:02:15
j. more stable per nation super nation cradle deviation only
00:02:19
deviation completely consistent it never changes so that's clear
00:02:27
and with as we said d. r. u. j. translation correlates a little bit too just to form length
00:02:33
so we then look next to patients who work clinically lacks impatience you came
00:02:38
to my clinic and were clearly unstable when we looked at the is
00:02:42
and we showed the the range in there on on to the armour similar
00:02:47
two before it was five to eight millimetres meaner six point five and then the
00:02:51
symptomatic side it was between ten and fifteen millimetres and they suggested there
00:02:57
might be a little does i know where and um in fact
00:03:01
it was a sort of or nothing that wasn't the continuum but we something
00:03:04
we should and that's not true but this is um exactly a difference
00:03:08
and then we did these testing reagan only deviation predation c. foundation and all
00:03:13
of them tighten the rest so when your t. i. u. j.'s unstable
00:03:18
doing something else to it will type it and therefore it makes sense to doing all the shooting else your tummy
00:03:23
will tighten your wrist and so that does might we haven't actually measured that yet that's got to be done
00:03:31
and then we added in a force meta and we showed that patients he was symptomatic could tolerate
00:03:37
less force before they felt symptoms and tell right less maximum force on assessing the risks
00:03:44
and again that's what you'd expect and then we look to destroy radio fact
00:03:48
isn't just remind you the light touches reasonably clear is suggests that
00:03:52
between thirty and seventy percent of patients with just two radio fractures had
00:03:55
d. r. u. j. instability if you look at the popular series
00:04:00
i'm i'm pleased to tell you that they're all wrong okay every single patient with
00:04:05
the uh uh just to radio fracture as the o. u. j. instability
00:04:09
yeah before you start running out the room to go and fix
00:04:11
them all i don't think they need treatment that just unstable
00:04:16
and what this implies isn't weaves done other work which says that is when you fall for this radio fracture
00:04:22
you fall first on the on the side of the rest you damage the d. r. u.
00:04:25
j. and then the force transmits up into the radius and you get a fracture
00:04:30
i just remember that 'cause we'll talk about it subsequently will say showed whereas previously
00:04:36
in the symptomatic patients actually the survey from the next one um be um
00:04:43
that was their brains like the outside of the range this more clearly crosses over
00:04:47
so some of these patients symptomatic aloft sound and once again
00:04:52
all the positions of the wrist and forearm increases stability
00:04:58
so as i say previous expensive said it's thirty to seventy percent and they're
00:05:02
on what they show is is the technical assessment is not very reliable
00:05:06
and we need to be measuring things but not measuring um we don't really know what
00:05:10
we're talking about with a lot to radio head fractures and we showed that
00:05:17
basically they run stable so if you fix the radio head they will always less they with the other side there's some
00:05:23
in the normal range he did a replacement they were all in the quite unstable range and if you excise them
00:05:30
they were very unstable again it may not matter symptomatic labour when your patients
00:05:35
complain of wrist problems having had radio head fracture that's probably why
00:05:42
so it looks like some d. r. u. j. instabilities inevitable
00:05:46
following these injuries and that therefore implies that the essex
00:05:49
the press deletion is not an all or nothing it's simply a continued you to go cruise please thank you
00:05:57
um and then finally worked its skateboard fractures and none of them had d. r.
00:06:02
u. j. instability in action uh use that that's a different mechanism of injury
00:06:08
so implications i said it lies on that spectrum that
00:06:12
all patients will be unstable but not symptomatic
00:06:17
yeah six the press d. is probably not a continuum and what we have
00:06:22
shirt and this is important is that non clinical practitioners on on x.
00:06:26
but it's not very good at assessing this and may sleep people are
00:06:30
not symptomatic until they're unstable about twelve millimetres that's appreciably outside all
00:06:38
now does come to conclusion so lies on the spectrum 'cause notice
00:06:43
the radio factors in radio head fractures but not skateboard fractures
00:06:48
and all changes in wrist inform position stay belies the d. i. u. j. thank you
00:07:05
oh is that we should really be why does this time is huge building um what it is
00:07:13
'cause i've now to find instability and not defined instability is more translation a nine millimetres
00:07:18
and that's what instability read the stable your unstable doesn't leno symptomatic
00:07:23
but we now we really got three groups and we should recognise that you read the stable
00:07:28
you all a symptomatic leon stable probably doesn't matter but you
00:07:32
need to recognise it or you symptomatic lee unstable
00:07:36
what it means is that when people staple lies than you do in adams proceed or something else
00:07:40
you never make and staple all you do is you make them
00:07:44
less unstable and take them into an a symptomatic unstable group
00:07:48
but it's important to recognise if you try to make unstable entertained you are when you're
00:07:52
not you're just deceiving itself and the patient so i think it doesn't actually yes