Player is loading...
A-1180 Evaluation and follow up of implants – the need for a standard
Torben Bæk Hansen, Holstebro, Denmark
Friday, June 15, 2018 · 3:15 p.m. · 02m 37s
Embed
Embed code is not allowed
This talk is part of a Private webcast, embeding is not permited.Transcriptions
Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:01
you speak choose this solicitation white when implant favour it can be patient factors as
00:00:09
we hurts uh this circle technique all the most useful suspect the implant
00:00:17
uh this is the next town huh so consumer formation to to metal on metal articulation
00:00:24
the the bunny surgeons has a long tradition of implant thing the and have they have learned a lot about
00:00:32
uh they use now stay plus implementation that's introduced by the neck macau
00:00:39
um and use national great distances to
00:00:43
identify implants with inferior performance
00:00:49
the step wise introduction in hand and breast implants may be a problem because it's it's not
00:00:56
i think approximately ten percent at maximum of the rate of the
00:01:01
implants in the pennies so it's it's a fewer number
00:01:05
uh it's a very industrial and economic are driven implant market and we have a
00:01:10
quite sure i think if an implant doesn't work well just to name one
00:01:16
so
00:01:18
if you look at the evaluation on you hand and with implants it's rarely poppy shake it a
00:01:24
as a separate clinical study liking the bunnies it's more single series and it's
00:01:30
most of all a lot of them are retrospective with different outcome measures so
00:01:38
i i think it's important to get some common clinical evaluation criteria it's
00:01:44
for a hand and wrist implants with the standard
00:01:47
standardised recordings are pretty important work to function
00:01:51
recording of patient evaluate outcomes using evaluate its measurements goals
00:01:58
and before new implants going to the market you should have
00:02:01
the radiological follow up with five year survival data
00:02:05
in selected sentence if possible with your x. rays as
00:02:09
mike and showed and supported by clinical data
00:02:13
and in brief i think we should be a good idea for the face to help with
00:02:21
uh establishing some common and patients before introduction of new implants and and and based
Conference Program
A-1174 Introduction
Torben Bæk Hansen, Holstebro, Denmark
June 15, 2018 · 2:01 p.m.
A-1175 Silicone MCP and PIP joint arthroplasty – still the gold standard?
Kevin Chung, USA
June 15, 2018 · 2:01 p.m.
199 views
A-1176 Pyrocarbon MCP and PIP joint arthroplasty – what are the benefits
Sumedh Talwalker, Wrightington, UK
June 15, 2018 · 2:15 p.m.
155 views
A-1177 Modular PIP joint implants – why?
Philippe Bellemère, Nantes, France
June 15, 2018 · 2:31 p.m.
164 views
A-1179 Wide awake surgery in PIP and MCP total joint arthroplasty
Mike Hayton, Wrightington, UK
June 15, 2018 · 3 p.m.
118 views
