Player is loading...

Embed

Embed code is not allowed

This talk is part of a  Private webcast, embeding is not permited.

Transcriptions

Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:01
well enjoy your presentation very much and uh we're gonna save the questions was the end but i
00:00:06
like to pose a question to you sick and think about it and uh anyone where
00:00:11
the common comment at being elegy studies in clinical trials is that you compare one tree men
00:00:16
to the other in the conclusion is that this treatment is better than that treatment
00:00:21
for the for the situation is that if if one tree men it both stream and has some some problems
00:00:29
would not be doing them at all in the future and in opinion he studies
00:00:33
the uh the traditional way is gonna say okay we have this much exposure
00:00:38
thence you have this kind of um condition couple tall and i think this indisputable some some
00:00:44
uh activities because that but the real question is that you have twenty three job descriptions
00:00:50
i wonder whether we can move to more personalised medicine phase uh precision madison
00:00:55
facing which we anticipate those patients oneness suitable for so the task
00:01:00
and give them the opportunity to engage in other task rather than a repetitive type
00:01:05
when you're is that because i mean that s. a. painters somebody has okay
00:01:09
but many of them can do it very well even with high stress situations by some body type may not be suitable
00:01:15
and i wonder whether as we move along at b. b. r. g. whether we can actually identify them way before
00:01:21
they get those conditions imposition them in the situation they can be successful anyway that's aside from my workers compensation
00:01:28
talk anyway my my yeah my passes talk by the fact the workers compensation how comes
00:01:35
after op extremity surgery i think that is the answer is actually very clear
00:01:40
workers compensation is at the for god comes a measure because traditionally they have was all cops we all know that
00:01:47
but that's true trace workers compensation understand little bit about
00:01:50
the context of workers compensation in the outcomes assessment
00:01:55
you know that's what 'cause compositions aware of form of insurance that require employees to
00:02:01
protect the workers and we actually started really start in the german system
00:02:06
you know changed employees relinquish the rights to their employee or no no
00:02:11
faults but the many variations of these no for things and
00:02:15
in america i think that many of these become ever so real relationship or that surely no fault
00:02:21
workers compensation basically i can believe actually a long long time ago there's some type
00:02:25
of a workers compensation flavour in two hundred to two thousand b. c.
00:02:30
but many countries industrial countries we have some form of what 'cause protection
00:02:36
in the u. s. workers compensation is changes state by state by state also changes every year
00:02:43
for example in michigan where worker unison michigan the compensation for loss of
00:02:47
arms so much more fifty thousand dollars more than the national average
00:02:52
so there's really no you know for workers compensation laws across given the us as
00:02:57
the unify conch in the us the uh state or federal government pay
00:03:02
six point five trillion dollars in total wages a couple workers
00:03:06
this is a huge problem in the us of course i'm sure that it's across the board in europe and also the asian countries
00:03:13
the the person all carpal tunnel syndrome cases that management ugly i'll work related in some way
00:03:18
try to establish what related to this based on previous presentation can be
00:03:21
very difficult and swatted at have injuries has a high crime rate
00:03:26
so let's go through this study's about workers compensation truly is workers compensation of this
00:03:33
factor when you look at all comes the traditionally have was all comes
00:03:37
i met analysis actually supplement analysis by the one that's most prominence publishing gem is seven years ago
00:03:42
found the workers complication across all surgical mask a scale the conditions are three to four times greater to
00:03:49
have i said especially all cops and this is based on very rigorous math analysis publishing gem
00:03:54
maybe study show the workers compensation status was the most significant predictor all comes when you look at any kind
00:04:00
of how come the treatment which means that we look at moscow seller conditions that we all interested in
00:04:05
you have to adjust for workers compensation and many times we live in a workers compensation
00:04:10
as one the study population because invariably they ought the friends thence the traditional patience
00:04:18
another math analysis on the workers compensation patience to have was all comes after stratified by conditional diseases
00:04:24
for all kinds of stuff including lumbar surgery op extremely so
00:04:28
be traumatic injuries ends mine surgery this is p.
00:04:31
hapless wind publication by regress buys stratified basin diseases
00:04:37
and couple has syndrome is a perfect opportunity to study workers compensation outcomes one year after surgery
00:04:43
it's amazing that seventy seven percent of workers compensation patients are you able to return to pretty internally
00:04:49
a vocation versus ninety three percent for most of us so there is a twenty percent difference
00:04:57
and we all kind of know the answer but you have to have evidence to demonstrate these was all comes
00:05:03
well this was all cops i think that when unit ever saw
00:05:06
relationship workers compensation you generally have was expectations about your recovery
00:05:11
i mean if you look at some of the patients who actually goes repetitive work
00:05:15
and putting one not one not not into machine eight hours a day
00:05:20
the satisfaction for that job is not great which means that when they start having
00:05:24
problems the ever saw relationship make them to have low expectations regarding recovery
00:05:30
so that that that's really a key factor with a patient want to return to work
00:05:35
uh with a secondary k. it would help my secondary gain the secondary gains obvious
00:05:40
i mean with a with a hard work they don't want to go back the same environment
00:05:44
to produce those injuries and furthermore where they're in the ever saw relationship in the workforce
00:05:49
well with people want to go back to those environment which means that the second again is
00:05:54
help me put me in another job in other environments so that can be productive
00:05:59
less educated maybe lesser support maybe higher what the man patted job definitely
00:06:05
more likely to smoke and psychological because maybe these patients have it
00:06:09
difficulties coping with a a stereo environment that they go into
00:06:15
why should we care well we care because we treat them becomes what kind it just because
00:06:20
there were good conversation patients to the mean that they don't have a real disease
00:06:24
made them do have brought disease i have a problem when we label workers compensation patients as a psychological
00:06:30
problem okay that's secondary gain so that's treated differently now have a problem would have to have
00:06:36
a a yeah i'm a corny the approach not just based on hand surgeons approach but based on
00:06:41
psychology is based on ergonomics base aunt people who actually look at uni work for us
00:06:48
we have a team approach manages patients so that the recovery
00:06:52
expectations can be enhance within forty percent of workers compensation
00:06:57
patients was to experiencing difficulties with eighty or twenty eight month after initial claims and i think
00:07:03
that we can remedy that tray in decision making to identify factors that influence prognosis
00:07:09
we cannot just look at surgery itself with the committee couple holler syndrome i think that we
00:07:13
have to understand i think it's difficult for hand surgeon to know everything about psychological
00:07:18
makeup of patient but when they come in with a carrying case manager that isn't ally
00:07:23
doesn't really helpful many of my patients come with a ally in the case manager
00:07:28
i think those patients we cover so much better because the case manager i would you
00:07:32
know my therapist to share with me the kind exposure to have at work and
00:07:36
then my goal was not only to the social problem post a system to place
00:07:40
them in different kinds of job and maybe indifference environment they they can thrive
00:07:46
their ability now comes measures also hampered outcomes assessment
00:07:50
this way the for courts to use a traditional all kinds measure for these workers compensation patients
00:07:55
because we already know that when the ever saw relationship they're not gonna be i will say truthful that's gonna
00:08:01
be difficult for them to answer those question there is the standard question there in a particular form
00:08:07
maybe you know when you're on the litigation why would you even tell anyone that you get a better most the time you want
00:08:13
to milk as long as possible and to the litigation goes away so one important factors we look at how calm says that
00:08:19
is your case to another location the cases and of the location those all kinds parameters are
00:08:24
are not useful when the off litigation then maybe maybe they
00:08:29
will have eight different types expectations and responses the questionnaires
00:08:33
so challenging to establish all kinds of workers compensation patients because the so call standardised tests
00:08:40
such as questionnaires may not be applicable even worse track record of standardised tests well people can
00:08:46
can manipulate how much they can squeeze those um corny amateurs and so forth so those things need to be considered
00:08:53
if there but it all comes measure some of the papers that we have
00:08:56
looked that's even on the uh on the shore nasty out i mean
00:09:00
when you look at compensated versus non come say the patients the um the bees response
00:09:05
is a very different even for the same kinds of conditions even for wrote
00:09:09
it have injuries the same kind of conditions you look at them is on to
00:09:14
say how come you're the responses to the question yours are starkly different
00:09:20
so one of my actually both my uh my at japanese fellows from um
00:09:25
for the other universes sitting there so like the ticket liberty of i'm presenting their data they did this is my review to
00:09:31
determine what kind of outcomes measure are most affected by receiving workers
00:09:35
compensation hand surgery patients actually went through the entire literature
00:09:40
for twenty years over her articles on hand surgery
00:09:45
sixty two articles some math analysis some of them as a summer use
00:09:48
does not randomised control trials also clinical trials and we process
00:09:52
data to understand exactly how do you measure workers compensation outcomes and
00:09:58
this was published in plastic reconstructive surgery that look at
00:10:02
satisfactory outcome such as we'd use pain such as paying
00:10:05
patient report outcomes satisfaction nerve conduction studies assortment things
00:10:09
and there was no change a worsening symptoms it consider as as say and says we
00:10:14
all come make it easy for analysis to consider as satisfactory versus and satisfactory
00:10:19
so i just went charming to the results section because it just work actually to over here
00:10:24
the encompass that patients are three times more likely to experience improvement after surgery don't
00:10:29
compensated patients so workers compensation patients for any kind of happy extremity injuries
00:10:35
tend to have three times was ah comes then those one that and
00:10:39
this was publishing p. r. s. passing reconstructive surgery just slash sure
00:10:43
this is a lease a it recently busy slide but if you look at some of
00:10:47
the so called the and not objective measures patient radar come such a satisfaction pain
00:10:53
you know the other things workers compensation patients has a how much much greater arts then now workers compensation
00:10:59
patients in affecting the outcomes assessment which means that this is very similar to what we talk about
00:11:04
questionnaires can be difficult to measure if you use cross sectional
00:11:08
studies if you compare what discount to not workers comp
00:11:11
invariably have the control for these three times the arts of differences
00:11:17
so is that the way we do what do we need to do cross sectional studies i
00:11:20
think that we also discovered that even with joint tendon and nerve problems more objective
00:11:26
kind of findings electorate honestly studies and ten the motion enjoy emotion and so forth the asses still
00:11:33
more the and that he uh non compensated patients so we got a so what you do or
00:11:38
what was compensated patients penned how was all comes
00:11:41
across all spectrums of topics remedy a measurements
00:11:47
and do you think that different countries have different findings rashes satisfied because we have
00:11:52
the data from the entire world so stratified the country's based on the us and europe and asia
00:11:59
the answers are the same regardless of what the laws you guys what the nuances of compensation
00:12:05
workers compensation patients the hat was all comes then and compensated patients
00:12:10
and this was found in another study that showed the same thing two point zero
00:12:15
here in the us when compared to the rest the war smaller studies
00:12:18
but regardless workers compensation patients even though the loss at the front
00:12:22
the difference they see us in different countries and different religions in different continents is still a risk factor
00:12:30
so how can i reduce l. workers compensation bias in the studies if one is have workers compensation patients your studies
00:12:36
i think that we found out that it's really important that you have a comparison without
00:12:40
a free operative measurement is very difficult to know what the changes so for study
00:12:46
to have free opt impose of the measurements is the critical portion you cannot
00:12:50
compare worker's comp to normal 'cause come patients as a comparison because
00:12:54
invariably you have three times the art of having problems so having prospectors
00:12:58
studies really important to measure effect of how treatment for this population
00:13:03
and the function measurements of these uh factors such as range of motion grip strength no study
00:13:08
bone union sense we test i think that you have to look at the whole spectrum outcomes measures questionnaires may
00:13:14
not be as precise workers compensation patients were compared to so call more objective all kinds for example
00:13:19
well union type what those things are hard to faint how to discuss but even with a range of motion groups trying to
00:13:25
pin string those things can be feign in patients workers compensation
00:13:28
you have to understand the limitations of everyone these measures
00:13:32
so my my overall conclusion is that i think the workers compensation patients represent eight distinct group
00:13:38
uh patients they need separate consideration but the ways of the screen to control for them
00:13:43
and one of the very good way to do things is that if that is a cop population that you're interested in and you
00:13:49
should be interested and we should be interesting workers compensation we gotta have prospective studies to really know the fact for treatment
00:13:56
thank you picture of use the machine

Conference Program

A-1137 Introduction
Torben Bæk Hansen, Holstebro, Denmark
June 14, 2018 · 10:34 a.m.
A-1138 Occupationally induced hand and wrist disorders
Jane F. Thomsen, Copenhagen, Denmark
June 14, 2018 · 10:36 a.m.
A-1140 Return to work after hand and wrist injury
Joseph J. Dias, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, UK
June 14, 2018 · 11:13 a.m.
Discussion
Panel
June 14, 2018 · 11:30 a.m.