Player is loading...

Embed

Copy embed code

Transcriptions

Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
i think yeah much uh e. one else for for give me the chance to present here
00:00:04
and again all what work is um person on trial is
00:00:09
um so we billing and learning algorithms which we
00:00:12
use uh apply x. rays to extract certain information what
00:00:16
prediction about what all the classification of the disease
00:00:21
um i think i have to give a lot utilities numbers uh
00:00:25
and summer you're is it's it's a lot of patients being effect but is uh try to
00:00:30
a to a tight is you know it has general is r. a. or all way
00:00:34
and he likes and on what these diseases all have in common and is that that imaging
00:00:40
uh is performed usually easy to hand is the knee is it um any other extremity um
00:00:46
and what we have seen here um my my teammate image types of that is that
00:00:51
um this whole is x. ray diagnoses uh which are
00:00:54
performed by physicians are usually quite subjective underperformed manually
00:00:59
i'm very often depending on the experience of decision was off that
00:01:02
day you know and time that that uh analysis being performed
00:01:07
and it's very often results at least what we've seen the case of last friday's in a
00:01:12
quite nonspecific treatment and we believe that um they are always out there to change that
00:01:18
so basically if you look at our applications let's say the field off you know lot testing than automation
00:01:25
automated analyses is a standard right you wouldn't find anyone looking you know that incoming cells anymore
00:01:32
um but unfortunately if you look at a few of radiology not peaks
00:01:37
and the way how be assessed x. rays nowadays is um as one of our
00:01:42
our doctors uses said i i was the said it's it's almost like a hundred years ago
00:01:46
so with the x. ray and we come up with a conclusion and medication comes back
00:01:50
you two years later began more less you look at it and then try to find out what has changed
00:01:55
and our approach was um to um kind of like a work from um to change it actually is that
00:02:01
we are actually can look into from a really active model which means that the patient comes to us
00:02:06
uh we look at the x. ray and we say well there is something i come back
00:02:09
actually when you know it's getting worse um that we go more to a proactive model
00:02:15
well we actually say well they are certain signs here which put it as a risk factor
00:02:20
are there certain anomalies in the x. ray basin that we started preventive treatments much sooner
00:02:26
uh or exact final exam would be retractable question much more
00:02:29
accurately did we say well you wait what's that direction
00:02:33
uh and based on that we can actually do something about that right and just waiting until um you know the page when it comes
00:02:39
to us with we see a pain so basically does what we are
00:02:44
doing um he again on the sample often e. x. ray
00:02:48
um where we actually use 'em weighting schemes like a lawrence score
00:02:52
for example and again this is your focusing on osteoarthritis
00:02:56
but we take the x. ray instead of doing it manually design and um we have a
00:03:00
software trained a base on the learning machine learning as we heard the previous talks
00:03:07
actually i take 'em all these men of measurements of the catalan score and put
00:03:12
it into a detail disease report um within you just if you sex actually
00:03:18
so um is you just screen job as screen shot of a recent the integration of our software
00:03:24
so basically you see here um the pain protocol where you see on the right side uh we just study
00:03:30
uh and then you see here a feature the the nice then hear the annotations by the software
00:03:35
um basically um we we remove that information initially they were like all kinds
00:03:40
of different from a she about you know ah suffice colour rose
00:03:43
in the likes so we actually kept quite simple based on the phoebe
00:03:47
from the radiologists which just show um the cable on score
00:03:50
and then there's the report here with all the the the uh was
00:03:54
equating the likes which i will go to multichannel next slide
00:03:59
so what is the output of um that software again you see the final played catalan
00:04:05
score for each of you know if he's a bilateral needs for each side
00:04:09
uh yeah he was a great as well and so it's a combination of cattle lawrence and was it
00:04:15
um then you have here in the lower part the report a great detail
00:04:19
measurements and and what we measure here are different and anatomical parameters
00:04:24
a joint space with joint space area which is quite indirect measurement of the cottage area
00:04:30
uh and what we ought to do here uh we have twenty algorithm to ah chi like i'm i'm
00:04:35
kinda calibrated for the distance you know the difference is a distance right so if a patient
00:04:41
stay still closed the tact or for out all the does have an impact on the measurements
00:04:45
and what we trained our software on was to compensate for these
00:04:49
measurements have uh what we call the standardised quantitative measurements
00:04:54
unless the of course uh what our goal was to provide to position a
00:04:59
a comparison to uh this case it would be left to right knee
00:05:02
but of course going for guide you would be that um the we all
00:05:06
just get the x. ray this can swing form and what your
00:05:09
feeling would get the end would be um that's and i support here and if the patient comes back a year two years later
00:05:15
um you can compare again you know either the final kale kale school or or uh
00:05:21
the sops course uh for joint space now rings the roses and austin fights
00:05:27
so here are just a some performance i cover sticks uh this offer is currently undergoing f.
00:05:32
d. a. approval so we went for all these uh validation sets uh and the likes
00:05:37
uh so for the confusion matrix is here the cattle lawrence great of course to detect if a
00:05:42
patient has away another way is um is um you know quite good the accuracy sensitivity specificity
00:05:50
where it becomes tricky as we heard a previously is especially in the early um
00:05:54
uh early some uh uh some of the disease scale one and two
00:05:59
we can see here um so that you know the two living here you see it it's
00:06:04
it's quite difficult to differentiate between one and two uh here especially scary here
00:06:08
but then when we go out for up to kayla three and four
00:06:12
uh the softer becomes much better in the green with with the ground truth actually
00:06:16
and this is based on the data set of roughly four thousand patients uh for your follow ups
00:06:23
so roughly fifteen thousand images which we collected a large uh us uh um multi centre study
00:06:31
we can perform there we decided so we said okay you know the software's here um we know that there is
00:06:37
a a you didn't rape can position so does a soft actually change something in terms of the grid positions
00:06:44
uh for this purpose we uh selected a random sample of her thirty six x. rays
00:06:49
we gave to position the plane x. ray and then we gave to position the same x. ray of course in different order
00:06:55
with the softer generate a report next it and ask position you do you agree with that or not
00:07:02
uh and basically see here um based on on the couple score is that you know
00:07:08
the the undated agreement between that with the specialists is here mark in in blue
00:07:14
um and then when they had the software with it then it was you know we get us um and improvement
00:07:21
in in each of these categories with exactly germans was nearing with a already agree without the softer very good
00:07:27
so was as a gift improvement each of these categories when a position actually
00:07:30
had to hang protocol at realised um report next to the x. ray
00:07:36
then uh with a big women rate um how do you agree uh between each
00:07:40
other and you see here the the blue circle one is the unaided uh
00:07:44
version and then if we gave them the the the report annex
00:07:49
it then uh we also saw that and still improvement
00:07:52
in a pretty much each of the categories so in other words and to position had something extreme where software
00:07:58
kinda gave you the every indication then uh and they start to agree more uh with each other
00:08:05
and initially the initial trial we had with k. loans wars that um the only get thirty percent
00:08:10
of cases so um so that was actually reading the we just study a big improvement
00:08:15
as to this is of course weren't you know fully blinded to what they are actually should uh should be doing
00:08:22
i'm not this is really just um to support uh without is of predicts the way you know you wanna
00:08:28
great certain common feature of the x. ray but not a question is can we also try this information
00:08:34
can we keep the decision information where they say well it might became learns to um
00:08:39
but you know are you the high risk of developing or you're not away
00:08:43
um and for that purpose our initial focus was on text analysis to use that as a
00:08:49
as an additional uh the data point either source in the uh in the image analysis
00:08:54
and actually texan else's is something which do not differ quite sometime most being used in the field of
00:08:59
false crosses detect uh the risk of a factor so we did basically we looked at um
00:09:06
again at a large uh us study where we had a baseline and follow up a data available
00:09:12
that and want to know um if we have a a base like with patients um
00:09:17
what what is the accuracy we can uh we can achieve to
00:09:21
then if i within these baseline groups all kills zero um
00:09:25
that you know how many of these patients actually will have kale large in one um in eighty four month follow up
00:09:32
today was the i'd hear a um and what we did then we build different models
00:09:37
look at uh things like a clinical risk factors section houses joint
00:09:41
space with with a lot and so on so on
00:09:44
and imply that all the results um and um what we see here is we
00:09:48
say five of male and female we saw difference between these two groups
00:09:52
um what you see here the blue line actually is here on on the look it females is the the
00:09:58
standard model way just have that little factors joint space with p. m. i. h. and and the likes
00:10:03
then if you just look at text analysis um so if you look at now um the
00:10:08
bone mike architecture as a as a i would say then the production mode likes
00:10:13
increased in other words um we went up from legacy of predicting which patient will be
00:10:18
in the progress or group from zero point six seven two zero point seven eight
00:10:22
and if we combine text analysis uh see here uh at the bottom
00:10:27
i take announces with him i joined space with and all the other factors
00:10:31
we achieved next c. of your point eight in predicting which of these patients in the
00:10:36
k. l. zero group actually we'll have yellow one higher identity foreman for awhile
00:10:42
the male group uh perform worse and we believe the main reason ever is that we
00:10:47
just had you know a very small sample size uh from from male patients
00:10:52
the main issue with protection else's though is that it's quite sensitive to the image parameters um
00:10:59
so you know playing on the large data set with different eczema dell is kinda tricky
00:11:04
so what we did as far as the next that actually was look at alternative such as the planning for example
00:11:10
uh and we use a day the same data set and uh
00:11:13
we were able to achieve almost the same results already
00:11:17
um so we're at seventy eight percent accuracy so far um and if you just compare that to
00:11:22
uh the work so i think a static little later so be my joint space age
00:11:28
um we already are we are performing the standard model with our keep learning model
00:11:32
which has the benefit that it actually tells you also which of the regions you're in the x. say what you see here is blue
00:11:39
patches you actually the areas in the x. ray pose the each individual patients
00:11:44
what a net but actually take it that he's either the yeah areas we're
00:11:49
at a form of follow up they will be a change happened
00:11:53
and so it it it's quite uh quite um and need to result here we
00:11:56
gonna presented at u. c. r. and in two weeks actually the or presentation
00:12:02
um but what other tools have we have to look that way half we can
00:12:06
apply these these these these these networks these people networks on other applications
00:12:11
i'm and r. a. of course we had already met previous presentation is something which very interesting
00:12:17
and again the same approach as with oscar tried is uh the first there was to use text analysis
00:12:23
to see if we can use text analysis to extract certain information or the
00:12:26
x. ray which helps their remote apologies to predict or the the progression
00:12:31
uh and initial results here against small a small sample size where a promising um
00:12:38
so so we are now expanding on that data set we have a another these which is much larger
00:12:44
and we do basically here is um in the first step is to automate the input data
00:12:49
um so basically um we have train the net work to um you know measure joint space with for
00:12:55
example and also detect contours which we don't data uh use for actually um the rose detection
00:13:02
uh and this this is just a mock up this this report you don't be some pay attention
00:13:06
it's really just what what the software does what we have tried the software on to detect
00:13:10
um then again um but we can only do we look at the sharp
00:13:14
score um to see um can we actually train a network to detect
00:13:19
on on which of the joints actually there is our already progression happening
00:13:24
uh and and of course uh the next it would be to use that to predict are a but that's where we are
00:13:29
right now so far it's really just a message on space with uh and to really assess the shark score automatically
00:13:37
um and application um is really just it's all it's all the same
00:13:40
concept basically to use it people networks and just give them instead
00:13:44
of hip a hand or a instead of any hand or hip
00:13:47
this case for example uh we look at catalogues measurements indicate
00:13:52
uh the first again is measured joint space with and then go again
00:13:56
uh also fights uh as closes all those kind of things
00:14:00
um and then you know what is and uh it was a nice ipods was
00:14:03
all the match automatic angles so you know the softer actually detects you
00:14:07
also contour second place an ad for the angles here so you know do
00:14:11
it all just doesn't have to mentally i click on the x. ray
00:14:16
um and then the last pet project it doesn't really fit so much it it is a it is topic but it's
00:14:20
really something which we work on just a month ago so work on that we're look at bone age assessment
00:14:25
um and um we have done we spend so much work in a few of
00:14:29
austria fridays um that we just thought you know hey now we have hand
00:14:33
now if your hands can be actually used what we have falsified is all the different with different feel
00:14:38
and just within a month actually i we were able to train at work to uh assess people in h. a.
00:14:45
uh in um you know with a with a with a with a range of plus minus five months
00:14:50
next this was um the winning cattle competition at our slate was eighteen actually was that range
00:14:56
so that shows you that showed us that you know if we have the proper image data
00:15:00
or you can apply these algorithms to almost any you know any any any data or
00:15:05
um but what is all important and what i must stress again we were before is it's all the input data
00:15:10
and this was it they're nice sample set with very clean input data are and
00:15:14
if you don't have that um you will not was a achieve such results
00:15:20
yeah in conclusion and the outlook reform from our point of
00:15:23
view is that these these people earning oh digital um
00:15:27
the technology is uh actually can provide crime savings by
00:15:31
automate automating uh so far pretty mellow process
00:15:35
we don't see the change of work was necessary these things one the background now we really became mature he you
00:15:41
know half ago two years ago it was very tedious now
00:15:44
these things um our um have become like grownups
00:15:48
um this whole solicitation an object reporting really we have seen does actually have
00:15:53
an impact so we think that is really adds value to it
00:15:56
um outcome measures is something which would you quite often do we know what
00:16:00
you mean is working not how can we actually track um the effectiveness
00:16:05
um things like a second opinion i'm in breast cancer these things are very common
00:16:10
innovative of pubic somewhat taller gee we're not there yet but you believe that you know
00:16:14
the time is ripe with these things also um our news more often that field
00:16:20
keep track of treatment changes i mentioned for sure and unless of course increase agreement between
00:16:26
readers and when i saw for your provides a a first reading on this
00:16:31
yeah with this i wanna kind of presentation and um
00:16:34
i think you can for time thank you how
00:16:39
honking which are a a question from the audience
00:16:46
a half want to start a new one just that he was saying comparing different model
00:16:52
it was like a each joint be emma it's on and then just
00:16:56
like uh was texture the so that was the first plaza second
00:17:01
um i'm i was quite surprised to see that combining the first and second
00:17:06
doesn't really improve significantly easy outcome because you move a a you see from seventy
00:17:11
eight to eighty which is clearly not significant uh you don't have the
00:17:16
confidence interval that pretty sure yep so so does it mean that most of
00:17:21
the performance agree that budget texture and the rest is just like
00:17:27
minor adults or does it mean that a sample size or how would you
00:17:32
explain that because maybe the focus should be on the texture only
00:17:36
and the rest is just okay now i have but not ready of added that yeah no i i do that with you
00:17:42
and and that was why we showed it was because we can like no question if faction as we add that much value
00:17:49
but we've seen that i'm actually really i provide information which you know the human eye um conflict or the x. ray
00:17:56
so we think that this certainly is the way to go and the reason i moved all the loading
00:18:01
is because we find it difficult to calibrate you know that images according to set the standard
00:18:07
and we've seen that with deep learning on the algorithms are the stage where
00:18:12
could easier work with x. wasn't even without this but if they would be a single standard in x.
00:18:18
rays then text analysis that we would be superior to most of the current her measurements we're using
00:18:27
so thank you very much is a pretty brilliant presentation very nice and uh i
00:18:31
have a particular interest in house or try to so actually want to ask
00:18:34
you is so from the most study what if an animal studies they actually
00:18:38
also look at at bomber lesions and mostly i'm right imaging obviously we
00:18:42
i song or high but not not most sorry about the most l. c. look
00:18:46
at us undivided okay yeah sorry yeah yeah okay yeah so i was
00:18:50
wondering so they are they found actually that were some and arrive features that
00:18:54
that they found predictive for development of radio graphical way later on
00:18:58
i was wondering how does this compare to your bone textual measurements can
00:19:02
you detected pretty early on and a second question would be
00:19:05
when using a production algorithm or you saw that most of the changeable taking place that either at the middle of the t. v. or
00:19:12
or at the edge of the of the bone but not in the central part where
00:19:15
normally would have a a college last do you have any uh explanation for that
00:19:20
um so so the first question um so we we just we're just signs look now into into these correlations
00:19:27
um what the work with the right now is to um actually look into
00:19:31
can we um predict or detectable male lesions on conventional x. rays
00:19:37
so in the away i study for example they had that correlations also you know we're trying
00:19:41
to detect a certain area based on an x. rating keep that back to that position
00:19:46
um i think is a very interesting um research question which we're looking wrote
00:19:50
to right now i hope i have no more results sometimes you know
00:19:54
we end this year um to the uh to the uh second question
00:19:59
i can give you an explanation uh why's that uh we you know if that old information to network and then
00:20:05
it's the little black box right they give you something out and you don't really know why these like that
00:20:10
so uh we need understand more you know the better way why that came that conclusion
00:20:15
and i think the key that will be the chip we have um more image data sets like you i like the most to repeat that and see
00:20:21
if these results are actually know almost same different patient populations for example
00:20:30
could be could be yes i've just the previous question um with the with the shop score this
00:20:36
shining pictures with the what is this a heat that yes and i'm just i don't know
00:20:42
what you think but for me when we see something shining on an x. ray or c. t.
00:20:47
we think about aspects eighteen so i'll still plus or packed a a close up take
00:20:54
but but this is beta thing right this shining it's it's
00:20:57
confusing me but amazingly it's and it makes me what
00:21:02
does this do with us how it it's that it's i'm
00:21:06
coming from and more like data science background um
00:21:09
those are concert would you use for different applications so on
00:21:13
but we still need to do to understand what the decision in what kind of formed a physician would like that information
00:21:19
the deal was really just to give him his position id or um on
00:21:23
the house you've your discharge was based on uh he met right um
00:21:28
i'm not too happy about that because we on it was it it's an specific matter right
00:21:33
um so i think they need to be more input from physicians well product exact i think that's a clinician i
00:21:38
would like to have this in future he met matt on the x. ray to see where is the emotion
00:21:45
sit here on the still a process or maybe i am check there for example
00:21:50
so uh that's something we need to yeah okay so so i can yeah i that
00:21:53
that's that's what we're not actually sure about with that with them that way production
00:21:58
and then and that you will works there we use the same concept with heat network show these
00:22:03
are the regions where it will compress the future above are a we actually just early on
00:22:10
alright so thank you very much so ah ha ha
00:22:17
that's why we're here to uh what uh what might go
00:22:21
from copenhagen i don't read the name of university because
00:22:26
um is too complicated for me i'm sorry i don't want to uh to be rude on that plane
00:22:31
and uh she would present a electro so he has one letter g.

Share this talk: 


Conference Program

Demystification the digital health world
Thomas Hügle
Feb. 1, 2019 · 9:41 a.m.
6593 views
1419 views
Digital lessons learned from musculoskeletal radiology
Patrick Omoumi
Feb. 1, 2019 · 11:37 a.m.
1910 views

Recommended talks

Finding delphi in medical imaging
Eldad Elnekave, CMO, Zebra MED
June 11, 2015 · 12:24 p.m.
179 views
Deeper down the rabbit hole of data, analysis, and inference errors and suggestions for digging back out
David Allison, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, USA
Sept. 29, 2017 · 1 p.m.
504 views