Embed code
Note: this content has been automatically generated.
huh huh firstly uh thank you uh
marco and catherine if we are very interesting presentation on ah
the global pasta global infrastructure how um
i wanted to say that uh what i really like
about this project is that it begins approaches
allowing communities to an infrastructure which i think is very important
and i spent a couple of use in london working for an engineering
firm on sustainable infrastructure and we worked with private public partnerships
i mean that prices learnt that often the private public partnerships with
design to favour the investor was rather than the community
and the question was well how can we we just this balance i
think what you've done with your project is a step for it
i'll have a couple questions to which i i the grateful if you might be able to
to to to to to respond to firstly how i i think
there's a definition of infrastructure which is perhaps not so clear
because the scalability of instruction we talk about very large infrastructure projects very small
localised infrastructure projects such as what you're doing in cali
and i think it would be perhaps in terms when you speak of
infrastructure to try differentiate the different types of instruction working with to
basically a line people's thinking of infrastructure because as you were talking about earlier
when your talking uh to invest just well you're talking finances it talking to communities
the notion of infrastructures right different so it might be perhaps it as you develop the project you work out in looking
at scaling the infrastructure in giving it a level so that
people can understand that the scale of that much better
uh yes yes wasn't quite clear was who actually other than the infrastructure that you were investing in
or you actually uh uh measuring and that might be something also to to bring out uh
who and finally who's also accountable for all the performance of that infrastructure i think ah um
that's these actually measuring questions per se but because often the people we might deliver the
infrastructure might not be the people accountable for because often you find a private public partnership supplied if uh
the list the infrastructure but often is the government is accountable for the performance of the
infrastructure through the local political system so you've also got a titanium to consideration
um i i work with international standards organisation on developing standards i thought
just on the standard you might want to consider using is i think the international
standard risk management us so up i thirty seven thousand thirty one thousand
is very very good tool but what it does is it teaches you first of all to define the context
of you operation and the good thing is it's it's which is so once you begin to let's say to find it in terms of
the city you can then take it down to a segment of
the city take it down to a particular implicit infrastructure project
which basically makes it much more transparent so you can see with things uh can be built up all broken down
uh and you might also look into to uh the standard thirty seven one twenty which is
a standard that came out recently around sustainable communities and quality of life
when you know that one yeah and that's a useful thing
uh i'll to secure is um if you focus i think from the examples was around um
developing countries in infrastructure which i think is a very strong market
for what you doing also situation so in the european union
uh we have this idea of libellous in markets
are basically making infrastructure competitive so the utilities
prioritised route ways of private sized
and this competition um these off into situations where the user can
stuff uh for instance in the u. k. where i live
we have a very extensive privatisation of roadways and this is uh
reducing rule in your directive would europe that all utilities or well
ways all ports eventually have to the product i just
but the down side of that is that uh the u. k. well oh passages by the law just uh
these in terms of tickets in the country in in in europe so obscures you how you can
consider this model for politically european context because they don't mind for infrastructure is
only gonna grow in the develop well because we soul with donald trump
and his idea that he's going to spend a lot on the infrastructure indeed was
the figure was quoted a test if you actually three point two trillion dollars
on infrastructure in the u. s. and that exclude she's twenty five billion for next can all on that
there is going to be a lot of need for what you doing not just in
the developing countries but also developed countries and politically worked with local communities because
what you do find ease when you i think the structure developer telling
him often dividing little communities so how do we build up
this notion of community speaking in one voice when there's infrastructure process
um and that's all i just wanted to to say all on that i think it's
wonderful concept and ah welcome it and i think there's a lot of potential
appear i'm conceptual as your project i again i think it's it's been concept um
one of the things that struck me though was
if we remember joss keeling in nineteen fifty five it
came up any started measuring carbon dioxide in why
and they got lately i stage release in nineteen sixty three that
there was perhaps a concept of a greenhouse gas emission issue
it took on to the nineteen nineties for really to become and issues in gauge the place
and that by the year two thousand and fifteen we finally have some form of
agreement around it and i was wondering the question ask us how can we
deal with your project in the face agency of the now
to ensure all that what you're doing and your findings
are disseminating quite rapidly so people can engage it but also to find out how can be engaged effectively
and i think part of it is looking at how you can use some form ajar management
audio data to get it out to people who can influence
and basically impact because we really don't have the beauty
that advice column with traditional scientific studies in projects which was the validation every time
and verified by various scientific bodies or situations before we go out there
we we can't lose that's uh that's other questions i'll try that you ah
i think isn't much role is very very good questions
um no i actually we we started out with this t. i. b. grading l. format
tool was developed for the p. p. p. context to exactly um and um
yeah i get a better understanding of the risk balance between a private the pride in the public
side for the what the sector and was financed by swiss government and uh as we three
so this development was actually done for that situation and was it tested um
to to balance uh responsibilities and risks for the public private site
although to to decide what to protect them the public side no way
that is where we stayed out actually to get that um information
that wasn't a very into doesn't five i wasn't there yet but that was the basic
that that's what we came came from and we think that's a very important um
a space to introduce some kind of guidance
on on the sustainability increasing inside
um at the moment we also um again trying
to work with uh and now they're organisations
got cream and they again having and and and approach to look at p. p. piece
um and she had the receiving and print procurement so that that the
pride yeah so the pride is a little get together before
the procurement starts actually to talk about the risk sharing so it is some
somewhat that's where we come from in a way to uh to
to have a better understanding of these problems you mentioned and p. b.
p. um we also when we go around to we we also
makes it is aware that p. p. p.s might not the best solution the best solution for them
um in some cases we think it's not a good solution and um
we also do capacity building in the sense with the cities we see decide
um you so far we had and that's the second question who is the responsible accountable part
um that mostly would me um all these and s. special purpose vehicle
like that the body and actually runs uh the project
and that would be one um that part in it but um
if i think of the projects we if i'm done so far for the testing
it is very maybe is make self off a soul the private side yeah
that was starting a project uh with this with um context and
um on the other hand we had you know ops innuendo situation
that wanted to run the project with as through the tools
to see where they stand with their sustainability assessments
so we we have a broad range of of um
brightness and to do assessments with an i.
n. s. michael mentioned for example in a city like joe burke utterance break we could also
help the c. t. the internal privatisation of projects
um by by by giving them our tool to have a benchmark they could
compare the projects they own projects to an each other what with
their hasty performance with their in my mental socially governance performance
so the the at different angles we come into um now to the project
um you know we we looked at the ice i so and and
standards and michael interest and development team they it would exactly know
which numbers but i don't but we uh and i said we always want to join some working groups in the next picture
um and i think i still i still um dialogue
so our on on there and that level there's a dialogue between is different bodies but
we'll that tried to take up a lot of the ice to work a um
for the question and uh in developing countries and the european application our new wheels or think that
the biggest need forest and it could be in developing countries and emerging markets and
that such a huge a lack of finance at the moment with
the estimation is that like seven to put the seventy percent of think destruction hasn't been
built yet that might be needed in the future and uh that's the fifteen
fifty and so they is a huge amount of infrastructure and a huge gap of investment
i'm also by the lack of of the possibility of probably finding
after financial crisis is not a choice we say oh
um if if if if you would have to probably funny please use it
but it's just not there so we always again in situations where
they they're in the developing context and that there's a need for private funding and
we try to find a way to to balance it to regulating away
um for the european market it anew i
is the air height question will the discussion get discussing with our
part as me think it carried a lot at this investment bank from friends
with me want to go to the european market and they think that day is
and need all the finest is um to outsource it because the due diligence
but we haven't tested it in the european market is that we have fifteen today but any you might get yet
so i think this is an an open question absolutely how this will be taken up
um and so will we we don't know about that at the moment and
that's good i like that
what is light is quickly the uh very quickly after speakers that
thank you the uh i think it it there's always stimulating questions because it reminded me just
to the virtual of this project is that it wasn't top down and think prizes and
going to introduce three or four of cops a famously because it that's when we gave up
on the notion of the top down agreement at the place for people back and
uh it's a it's a open region of church or local governments locally and so forth
at which level the readiness to act is infinitely high or larger and more advanced and
if you look at brussels where she has been bit did hand off agree having to agree is terrible but
it's even more trouble look at what national governments to to local initiative uh when the clues uh
cities for climate change protection or for them a mediation
uh was launched um sixty percent of the
members of local governments were industry
um what three hundred years
why because they don't was it was a guest local government one to two so
well i mean i remember at the seventies were doing soul architecture uh because of climate change because
energy crisis but this was all swept aside not not because people weren't ready for what do it a
lot because it it it left the national jen and so when he is the whole that
we understand what the logo means of doing and then trying to
even connect the actions to their own criteria but that's
one thing we found an old english then we have national
criteria sustainability that nobody's use that used to statistical part
the measuring all kinds of things but when you go to local government or even a national problem in
terms of this is to build the program the energy programs also transmit problems be using complete different
criteria so even just for more reporting point of view reporting back to process speak
it's important why is it important because the funding uh parties in process or painted
stop and ask infrastructure visions centralise euro a big highways
transcontinental uh electricity networks connecting
ever harming nuclear power plants and and and and and coal fired power plants at backing up
no and i mean division is crazy you clean energy union is
just mad and so does the only thing that i'm
grateful for uh in the praxis spectrum because it might wake up to your paying
shake up to you and say look we are we a
union of regions are union of um aligned local
realities and whether renewable energy paired and we can actually make that work we don't need
uh to maintain coal fired back up such a spectrum that's is currently taking
place in german would pay qualified operators to maintain that thirty machines
to justify the renewable energy transition produces stochastic must be
backed up but we'll men's energy part of course
but thank you very much for that inspires us to um
reinforce our look at that spot in that context and asked us or
yeah just to say that the fact that we are coming up with a room
there you can find group on this project to each one of one one more effort
to speed up the the fermentation of any possible project these kinds of eh um
of uh situations of initiatives that we hope will not only once but uh they
are definitely there to mark to as a multiplier effect us multiplier effect
uh but i've of course are not enough to have too much more than others a pascal
but the home thank you very much to catherine um are you and and peter for these
uh two presentations that in a way i found more answering one to each other
so you started with the question mario my i'm asking what you've thought could be in the
same field of interest for architects and and and you know what you are doing
you you suspected that you had some common grounds and um in some ways what peter has shown
is showing a lot of common grounds but it's also in this way of showing some
difference of approach but i think would be very interesting to do we could change because um if i i
i'm going to give the point of view of the architects oh well i'm the i'm in this position i'm
mainly looking at buildings even if i'm looking at the overall john environment and i'm also the guy was no money
so he's not investing in anything so is looking at other criteria than the market driven
um whole market oriented approach so the first question now would have for you would be too
you are we laying as far as i understood maybe i didn't maybe i
need to have more explanation but you're laying on the very um
every assumption which is but the infrastructure is making the city
which is in a lot of case true of course but not only
there are things and some words what will pronounce by peter like a narratives
the symbolic aspect and pictures that were shown was showing that but there are
other aspect of the c. d. how people are dreaming of a
city and what shapes and forms could be in history in references in
somebody cool um fields um a useful to your studies too
um because if you look at the um the images that were produced after your your your studies
which i strongly believe absolutely necessary and uh producing it kind of uh of uh uh
transparency on on problems and and and and cross disciplinary approach
which is we're providing a good too for analysis
you end up with the same images spend every c. d.'s and
making you ending up with up quite often at the
or a um the what what's the name him by the the group that the corridor between the
the industrial corridor and they all look alike i mean the the tram why in in in cali
e. i could give you sections of exactly the same thing in in other cities
so that we need to have for the future other
visions of of what is specific to a place
and uh some pictures that appears a as shown are talking about that what is uh
what is the um the specific solution but we need to find in this place
so the question of narratives and the question of how you design the city but how you dream the
c. d. is um i'm going to look sound like the dreamer in the on the ah
uh among uh uh the the panel here but it is very very important how how could you
i'm an alliance or uh make an assessment
of uh of these uh dreams visions and that's uh would that would or enrich your your approach
very much i don't know how to do it i just think that it's necessary absolutely
okay yes thank you very much these are crucial questions that we
sort of already talking to accounts now you make example
of comedy from way your total replaceable in this
uh crawford that's shown um what we did nothing to this particular case oh
i have to start all the way we were looking for example was
um where architects could relates to so this is why we came up with this
whole idea of transit oriented development because we think this as a huge impact
on this design off to c. t. um we have other examples without this is
something that the audience could easily related to um now what we did
and i fully agree with you um what we did in in in carly
is um that was my starting point we really went out to
streets i'm not me personally but um uh interview is and interviewed around
the fountain people living around the corridor but also further away
uh first before asking what got the strength in to see what are
the weaknesses and how could the potential green cory tore a support
um to to to to overcome barriers over regent and poor and so
on and there we also have only took into account local traditions
even festive also colour listed world capital of salsa so be incorporated
this into the whole quarter bear the concept so um we
don't see that that there is one silver bullet for infrastructure solution it
has to be tailored to the local circumstances but this is
totally clear i'm i'm not a hundred percent sure how to include
that in the standard we can definitely look into that um
so yeah i i i think i i that's wonderful idea
but you know when we can mean with with the standard we can mean when the project is defined
that's when when the standard is applied it's when infrastructure project has been defined we can can
mean a yeah in the in the project cycle but to put it is there
so that's why we see our more our point of interference to
avoid the worst and developments to guide the project from the
the best face it the p. visibility face to plan to consider
social current economic development to consider stay calm engagement to consider
t. h. c. wishes to consider resilience in the very first phase
oh we can't get there before the product has been defined
so this is our limitation but it but that's what we try to get this done up with the city with this probably sick the supplement to
be able to have a dream wanted to uh but but for the standard itself that's when we get in
i don't know if you have a solution uh well i i don't know i it would be great if you could influence that
maybe through um a narrative scenarios
telling even if the the question has already been uh asked by
the the local government okay we want a transportation system
maybe you could also influence them on other sites and uh and
very often what happens for architects the rule often we well given that program
and the very first question we ask is is that the right program
and you switch it you put everything upside down it's something that people hating
us for us for for this but it's it's in our duty
we had three times in in the consultation process is we we had exactly that um
question how do you uh incorporate the question of do we actually need that infrastructure
so i'll how can we incorporate that when we have a stand that that actually is is rating infrastructure
so this is a very hard to um room which i think was discussed at least for
two three hours because we try to some incorporated it into an impossible five situation
or try to do was than if i remember correctly that
we try to place it in a stakeholder engagement process
so that it is strongly incorporated there to ask actually doing
it to integrate this take all this in the very
early phase at least to ask is that the infrastructure you want well you don't want mostly to yeah yeah
but just me i uh it's it's a bit of it 'cause you you in the business of uh assessing creating
uh reading off the performance um that sustainable
performance of of what is infrastructure project you have to have a
new contract a a provision that you're able to completely
condemned the project will say you don't need uh and uh uh you have to be able
to do that otherwise you become captive act didn't it was over conflict of interest
uh that that's because you're not and stuff and have a good from where as
many also them try to become concerned i didn't fail that wouldn't be certified
they say and there's a a level off of a play each criteria there is
there's a level they have to actually pass or the other thing i
think it's important to be uh involved as early in the process part yeah
yeah that's what what we do we getting in in a in a
previous really physically fit and the other thing is of course you we shouldn't get paid but
people that know we don't we don't it's it's it tried to certified
that's right yeah that's the basic of what we do is they we're not we're sent onus so maybe do explain explain this is done
we only standard was set the rules and then as a third party message frank and they will fail
so and this is our approach if the product does not apply
yeah yeah that is that is the part that's the problem yeah but it's not if we we when we get in
we only can assure that that infrastructure if it's built it will build
it will be built in a certain way that it doesn't harm
i'll a certain ways that that that's our function in that yeah
yeah we do have some excursions like military and and a a concentration camps yeah
oh no it's easy as they're excluded yeah well okay yeah i don't know if that's what i think it i
think now we're getting into an interesting question out and we were getting what what morning up because nothing's getting
to the point that we understand the thin internal contradictions of the development procedures everywhere
so just make one comment that i'm not look and then uh maybe we have a
very interesting discussion of adjusting the meeting briefly with the stakeout cons with w.
w. f. in there we have c. forty um you probably know and the clip
um and we have chinese engineering associations in there to the question was
can you clear plan to get certified or just the part of it is it new technology that development
that makes it more system that can be just certify this one particular element of the nuclear plant
you can imagine what c. forties aunts was was um but um how india which we have also um through a
uh um um investment banking their what their own so was so clear that was a discussion we we had
as katrina said it all criteria so consensus based so
ultimately everybody agreed on not having nuclear plants in
you can to folk had the question has a question uh_huh yep thank you thank yous
a friend assume but i of course invitation for thank you for your presentation
i was very impressed if you're about those
standards and all these regulatory sings but
now it's going a bit too much ensues engine during discussion used shouldn't
because the fungus young priorities i see i sink interested to bring it to
the people in the end and then you replace my question is
you know if you're talking about infrastructure you're talking directly to
me because you're talking about a new type of landscape
and you're talking about new scale of infrastructure and wonders
when i worked with my students in istanbul friends and i
found out so they are planning a second possible was
you know what i mean so if they have a pose problems and ceases for
two reasons if you turn the other man would be for container ships
and and working with the phone set sister project for it so it was bruce and
next year's it will open a new airport we see a to perot run base
and then my question is your your little bit running out of
measuring if you're measuring says big project it's easy
but if it's coming to soft skills lurk let's say my students always belief
but the connection inspector as equality and sunset sorry so it's
not always better so for instance i'm completely against
and the extension of public transport around zurich it's a
political position and it's a political attitude because
in the end you only have to move on to rick and we lose use political system i found very good
in a a sports and so connection is not always good souls and send a
very simple question how much mobility dude it's same about when you're talking
about any chewed how much mobility to be neat and then it's different if
you're talking about the corridor connecting brought to them to to train around
it's very good for the economy but as the lines get in between have some problem
of abandonment because it's mister connection but to one who likes that not lax and
but you want to and then i'll come back to the start yeah i think it's a really
different questioning developing country they live here they need connection then it will be t. and whatever
and so it's a totally different question in the development context but i don't understand that
that that we have to find out what exactly is that need in that context
i think this is was something we have been dealing with unlocked and
which was a brief you mention that we try to have an
representatives of all the reaches in a standard committee and then it gets
really complicated because the this theory context and the bangladeshi context uh
is is really hard to compare and they they it was like an additional layer
to our complexity of having different sectors also to deal with different project sizes
and different regions and and um
and i don't know if we would have a solution but we we had a discussion for for
two years to try to to have a consensus that there are certain questions and no
i actually covered by all the criteria if you combine
then them day then cross referencing through the criteria
and that you would have a solution that i would be happy couple for different situations
and and that we might have some kind of um i believe that for
the context to the balancing off this company in social and and uh
environmental questions that we would find in not an i. t. r. but they're a balanced um
approach for the context but it wasn't a yeah i did i don't think that we
have the ideal solution but it when it was taken up again 'cause context oxidation
but uh so i'm not really much time so i know situation quite well easy outs
and i think i agree with you it's not so long ago we didn't
have to hate us we didn't really have enough teachers to work with his tunes
and so on and i wouldn't have a problem if everybody in such um
audience or or congress is suing you know we've seen
and our whole always have to pack up your different the numbers will be no fifty
percent of the world population live in cities and i hear insert years fifty percent
i for one question what happens with the landscaping people still living
in the band and landscapes and so that's a problem
obviously aren't and then my colleagues it's the th they're always saying
two degrees more in fifty years but says with browser for 'cause it's not
to be able to to um you want to resonance next next week
two and when i was a student i was just tools in two thousand sixteen we will have
fifty percent less forced in europe but we have
much more sons and senses dramatic change
and then it's very difficult to bring it down and we have to find and so it's really
an open discussion of the critique we have to bring it down to hers or for instance
because i'm a so called expert and then i'm invited to so part controversies
use with national park and people voted against it two weeks ago
and then our with local people because other experts
and you really critical and emotional rebates
and i can tell you we have to build up trust these people tom don't trust us
because i seem especially in the out you have to think about the new economy
new ways of re or are we are organising transformation of c. out because
even the regional organisation doesn't really work and so these people
don't trust us that's a problem if you want to implement new ideas new economist
we have to be able to like you do it too much closer to
these people and it's a real problems that so you don't trust us
so for instance if very it's a very to a simple
uh redmond you're talking about numbers if your religion switzerland
is shrinking more send five hundred people it doesn't work
anymore not because economy because of social and cultural
missing people so we're doing type sports communities cultural communities
you lose the culture so that's that's a real problem and to explain or to translate on
the stop loss to the people is not so easy because when i see you
you could go to cool fruit production going so most humans always proposes
stuck to be menu for so problem you have concealed because
my quality to british ideas use with salt marshes english friends and saying
what do we know more concerts versa it's very ramming taint percent
for me it's agriculture so it's a completely different and i think
you have to understand that you lost something and sets
to reason as industry doesn't work anymore so we have to have a new economic concept and
i don't know how and it's really no discussion not to critique what can we
do and it's different in slovenia in france or germany or in in switzerland
and then we have says region says euro person return that could
be a chance to do for the next development but the
first would be needed new economy it's the same as the mobility
we have to rethink completely to in a different way
and um i just want to say uh um uh uh first of all
to react to pass goals for their reaction on the image of carly with the time we also have
exactly the same thought with image could have been everywhere has to do also with the fact
that a him quantifying approach that you have because you need to work with measures
is a global system use a global lies um or a level him
approach seen just talk with members and seems everybody has to go
around the table if they want to partake in the discussion they need to talk with members we have the same number culture
so they have the same basis there is in the eleven of cultures there's a lever in of different is
happening because we need to discuss if we need to discuss with the same language which is english
just right now little by little our way of thinking will become will get closer
and and then our images would get the same or more the same basis
i think approval process that is very hard to
fight against unless we accept differences in the
works of differences then we get into other kinds of oppositions would could also be
linguistic oppositions eh for the positions mineral and so on and so forth i mean
cool having at some point uh what we're actually even work at arriving at a at a um
apart boxes that are part of our eh um
a western um are integrating them whatever
you can call it a catcher that needs to have a which is also very
expansive very dominating and the out of the fact that in
colombia the doing of the same part a term we
like i seem perishing grenoble it's exactly the same image is positive and negative at the same time yes please
uh_huh numbers don't care about written design yeah we we think about to grow in approving images
i don't think it's necessary to do with uh the we we assess quality
i think yes we changes as a quality the same way but
in a sense but in this project us as well to really try
and understand how the local governments assess their own sense of
qualities and then collect those different images that
criteria and the assessment correctly under statistics
as they define them locally and and working does look workshops to try to
get them perhaps to respond to the offer two of 'em checked them whether they really suitable out then
we collect only is and see what have an overall image of everyone's view of the world and
the only teacher was i able to do that without walmart everything
but we will select some so called keep you guys keep performance indicators that are common to the more
the reason perhaps can i upload to a higher understanding but not to
direct what is happening on the ground but just understand comparable performances
but this this problem of the harmonisation applying but that is a problem as
it i think it's being manifested in the way we look at data
but i'm not sure it's cause by the way of evaluating it was not a cause and effect uh um i don't
know to which is because what effect but there is a correlation for sure there's a correlation that we need to
i mean there's a part where we need differentiated words and characters but we all
discussed in the same terms there's a problem i mean we have to accept
there's another or just uh just one footnote that's just just one footnote on
those of that but um i uh um this idea of um
no economy is really for a but it comes from also
understanding that uh this or just as upset orders interest
in organic agriculture is just the health aspect is also a suit to management and but it was a
it should be the green hours that we look at the well organised well
managed which colour culture those it does it's causes you to a meeting
by diversity does it's you haven't as you know switzerland has in its cities a
higher level of but it was it didn't it's a control because it did
so it's it's critical to reform revolutionise that we we do a coach and that's i think
critical uh in the way you call for new economy 'cause economy isn't just a
digital commits also want attest to rely on a minimum of land management factors
which don't really require starting from scratch but to transform the way we understand we're for real
uh um to be able to to manage to to work but it was yeah
yeah i did it and then let that let be a big word
ah no it don't also comes in this whole discussion of localisation
and and the economy we're having at the moment and our infrastructure is part of that
and it also comes the discussion you even start it
oh uh mentioned it's about a a nero colonialism
how well we need to go to india or china or johannesburg
and and say oh you do need don't meet whatever they think they need
that these it's it's such a complex um is situation and and maybe a different so that
we always working and working a lot with with um other coaches and and uh
i it can not make and and uh uh cultural situations where
we are just the one coming in at this at this stage but not the ones to decide uh what the
needs of the of the local population is add we presented by and mayor or a a local government
it's good for last work very good so i i hope you're hungry enough to make a post now uh we

Share this talk: 

Conference program

Panos MANTZIARAS, Directeur, Fondation Braillard Architectes
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:10 a.m.
Antonio HODGERS, Conseiller d’État chargé du département de l’aménagement, du logement et de l’énergie (DALE), République et canton de Genève
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:11 a.m.
Panos MANTZIARAS, Directeur, Fondation Braillard Architectes
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:24 a.m.
Philippe BONHÔTE // Ivan VUARAMBON, Architecte, professeur, Joint Master of Architecture, HES/GE-HEPIA // Architecte, chargé de missions auprès de la DDC
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:46 a.m.
Nicolas TIXIER // Jennifer BUYCK, Architecte, professeur, École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Grenoble // Architecte, maître de conférences, Institut d’urbanisme de Grenoble
8 Dec. 2016 · 10:15 a.m.
Dominique BOURG // Rémi BAUDOUI, Philosophe, professeur - Institut de géographie et durabilité, Faculté des géosciences et de l’environnement, Université de Lausanne // Sociologue, professeur - Département de science politique et relations internationales, Université de Genève
8 Dec. 2016 · 10:44 a.m.
Katharina SCHNEIDER ROSS // Marco GROSSMANN, Deputy Executive Director - Global Infrastructure Basel // Director Implementation Services - Global Infrastructure Basel
8 Dec. 2016 · 11:42 a.m.
Peter DROEGE, Architect, professor, Liechtenstein Institute for Strategic Development
8 Dec. 2016 · 12:08 p.m.
Pascal ROLLET // Robert SADLEIR, Architecte, professeur, École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Grenoble // Économiste - Westminster University
8 Dec. 2016 · 12:35 p.m.
Grégoire BIGNIER // Peggy GARCIA, Architecte-ingénieur, chercheur, Laboratoire LIAT, ENSAPM // Architecte, postgrade EPFL - Maître assistant associé, ENSAPM
8 Dec. 2016 · 2:52 p.m.
Alexander SCHMIDT, Architecte, professor - Institute of City Planning + Urban Design, University Duisburg-Essen
8 Dec. 2016 · 3:18 p.m.
Sabine BARLES // Gunther VOGT, Ingenieure, professeure - Universite Paris I, UMR Geo-Cites // Paysagiste, professeur?Institut fur Landschaftsarchitektur, ETHZ
8 Dec. 2016 · 3:49 p.m.
Frédéric BONNET, Architecte, professeur - Académie d’architecture, Mendrisio
8 Dec. 2016 · 5:10 p.m.
PAOLA VIGANÒ, Architecte-urbaniste, professeure EPFL et IUAV, directrice du laboratoire Lab-U/ EPFL, membre fondateur de l’agence Studio 16, Milan
8 Dec. 2016 · 5:43 p.m.
Pascal ROLLET // Günther VOGT, Architecte, professeur, École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Grenoble // Paysagiste, professeur Institut für Landschaftsarchitektur, ETHZ
8 Dec. 2016 · 6:13 p.m.
Reinier DE GRAAF, Architect - Office for Metropolitan Architecture, Rotterdam 8 DÉCEMBRE 2016
8 Dec. 2016 · 6:39 p.m.
Reinier DE GRAAF, Architect - Office for Metropolitan Architecture, Rotterdam 8 DÉCEMBRE 2016
8 Dec. 2016 · 7:21 p.m.

Recommended talks

Panos Mantziaras, Directeur de la Fondation Braillard Architectes
24 Feb. 2016 · 6:05 p.m.