Player is loading...

Embed

Embed code

Transcriptions

Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
the independence yeah we different and and it was way i i definitely not an engineer and make
00:00:06
changes later and filmmaker yeah very diverse group of
00:00:12
people i know my projection translation and um
00:00:18
there is a way happy as we think yeah yeah we have neglected you
00:00:23
repeating our from work so far we haven't uh included much they
00:00:28
and perspective offering architect into our
00:00:32
sure standard you just well he yeah that right now
00:00:39
okay they have you have you consume place yet that we see on on
00:00:45
the okay uh income is your panels to to continue to ignore
00:00:49
shorter on on play otherwise i will get myself into div confuse probably so oh
00:00:55
in this started off this potential partnership we
00:01:00
we thought like are we really talking about the same thing
00:01:03
or are we talking for relieving on different planets so
00:01:07
having the egocentric project taking architectural
00:01:11
perspective nor urban planning perspective
00:01:14
and we're coming more let's say from infrastructure project
00:01:18
perspective um it was sentry taking up
00:01:22
issues like the ecological transition unitarian or agencies and so on and so forth um
00:01:29
in our vocabulary we're talking more about nature based solutions
00:01:33
to infrastructure we talk about land use environmental protection
00:01:37
receiving concepts in particular but also ah long
00:01:41
life cycle assessments um socio economic development
00:01:46
and and everything connected to this and particularly a stakeholder engagement um
00:01:52
but now that i have seen the presentation this morning i'm i'm totally convinced that
00:01:57
we're actually talking about the same thing maybe from a different angle but
00:02:01
actually want to achieve the same things um and i hope that the after
00:02:05
particular to the case studies that we present or simply highlights um
00:02:11
you will have the same feeling on the you're ready to explore potential synergies in
00:02:17
terms of research and we have a suggestion um that we would like then
00:02:20
at the variance discuss with you um the thing that's the time i already
00:02:25
handover to katrina and that would come back with the case studies of
00:02:31
so i'm going to just briefly tell you what your instruction battery is because we also differ
00:02:36
in that way we have foundation we're doing research but we're not in research um body
00:02:41
so um we have been have what seems to resonate and we went in the space of
00:02:47
off i'm pushing and promoting sustainable and receive infrastructure in
00:02:51
many ways on the financial side any engineering side
00:02:55
and also on the political level so we also in in bodies
00:02:59
like of innuendo and bodies in the world bank steering committees
00:03:04
so we we we try to be politically active to does also maybe not the approach um
00:03:11
these are beat that that that the other things we're doing it just to give you the
00:03:15
landscape of what we're doing one the one we're talking about today's issue standard but um
00:03:21
we also have a their financial products because we think um
00:03:26
s. doesn't like finding especially in emerging markets and
00:03:30
developing countries for infrastructure we went to to single out and there is even insisting other projects
00:03:37
for finance to make them wake attractive because uh we would
00:03:41
think we would reduce a risk uh for finances
00:03:46
we'll do a um really implementation work um by michael going to different
00:03:52
projects and i was hoping with feasibility studies business cases and
00:03:57
um i i mentioned the policy work and we have also big events we did five t. i.
00:04:04
b. senate's where we selected about two hundred projects so far with another tool we had before
00:04:12
which are the self assessment tool um where we promoted these apply to any projects to investors
00:04:19
and
00:04:22
uh yeah i went to a more about how how important you have it is also
00:04:25
to have infrastructure for a a an accomplished it they already mentioned development goals um
00:04:33
and now i would like to introduce you to the main projects uh it that it was the most interesting to you i think
00:04:40
into this and project is that the sure stand it it's a standard for
00:04:45
as as the others in infrastructure and as i mentioned before we had
00:04:50
and now the tool before which we use the three years
00:04:53
before which is called the j. b. grading and and that was a self assessment tool and we thought it wasn't enough
00:05:00
to pass wait and specially investors but also to really certify project of the self assessment
00:05:07
we thought and we did a lot of research and interviews with investors
00:05:11
it is a need twice a third party search yeah they fight standard
00:05:16
a global standard um with a a whole body off
00:05:21
and an issue in system and certification system any impact assessment uh um
00:05:29
uh coming with it the standard has been developed for two yes
00:05:35
um we had a huge um logistical the outreach as sure
00:05:38
that they're they're members of these bodies laid on
00:05:42
and the idea was to do it in a nice little it's a braille organisation you might not know that either it's in
00:05:49
um but no no station for sustainability standards you set certain codes
00:05:53
the code for procedures a code for assurance echoed for impact
00:05:58
assessment so we go very strictly and on those codes when we develop the standard
00:06:05
the idea is also that it's um um
00:06:10
that it's based also on existing standards we're not sector specialists
00:06:15
so we did a lot of research on existing standards and integrated them
00:06:20
into that standard but what was lacking was the financial aspect
00:06:24
so we integrate add to the existing standards and also for
00:06:29
example you might know the essay a hundred trough
00:06:33
um the natives with standard for instruction and and other frameworks like them
00:06:38
ah well paying safeguards live c. performance standards it existing standards that
00:06:43
that we we base this one on and we integrated
00:06:48
um frameworks like this is the impediment goals the
00:06:51
the climate policy the the by diversity and
00:06:55
agreements uh into that thinking and the sender framework for for is good a reduction
00:07:04
and he can see that pretty much three big stakeholder groups
00:07:10
we're catering to one is them popping institutions uh well within can help
00:07:17
with that the increased quality of instruction itself they're great resilience
00:07:22
and i'm sitting up appropriate procurement criteria for his g. and um
00:07:29
had to support them to use their their their limited resources financial resources in a better way
00:07:36
um the benefits of financing sideways and we
00:07:41
have the investment banking now i secretariat
00:07:45
uh they do that together with us to make sure we we also understand the needs of investors
00:07:52
it's a bit steering identify just anybody mention opportunities but days and you want
00:07:57
to invest unsustainable uh and infrastructure and to reduce risk in that way
00:08:04
appropriate developers it's it's also um some helpful and um moments for
00:08:11
for example early identification of potential causes of delay into this
00:08:17
you can see our our up and down as bodies
00:08:21
three strictly organised according to these i seal codes
00:08:25
we have it and start committee which guides as is the colour cancel a
00:08:29
big uh body would you like to start committee and the secretariat
00:08:33
and you can see we have the um u. p. investment bank we have um the loving
00:08:41
my mental facility we have cities like chinese of africa um we have new orleans
00:08:48
and seems the sighted debate i mean i have a lot of n. g. o.
00:08:51
s. and l.'s so un bodies are you and how to tighten your cops
00:08:56
um and a lot of other consultants or defiance and and
00:09:00
down engineers decisions we try to cover the spectrum
00:09:06
these are the criteria to came up with after two years
00:09:11
it looks easy here it took us two years is consensus based so they would have to agree and these criteria
00:09:19
and sometimes it was really hard to uh create a common language 'cause
00:09:23
even enjoy engineer says client it's not a totally different right now
00:09:28
a multilateral development banks as client and they would use the
00:09:33
same work but they have a totally different concept
00:09:36
behind that everything into very interesting yeah and development for two years to create
00:09:42
that language that understanding and then limited down to a set of criteria
00:09:51
uh_huh okay so how this could then eventually look impracticable show you with the very last um
00:09:59
example or case study what you see here is an example that that's
00:10:04
been a mention by even before it's tremendous perk um spend some
00:10:08
months there to support the c. d. of johannesburg and the situation
00:10:12
is pretty much what what uh even told you it's um
00:10:17
let's say to make it short in the in in a a part timer
00:10:20
she him there was no connectivity off it's a townships to business opportunity
00:10:26
you see here to central business district in the survey talk you're one of the remote
00:10:30
because township um thought no connectivity to whatsoever
00:10:35
to business opportunities um and what
00:10:39
the city of a johannesburg pondered er last mayor parks
00:10:43
how decided to do is to create so called
00:10:46
cory tours of freedom which are basically um connections the
00:10:52
first one actually second one actually was from this
00:10:54
township uh so we talk to to central business
00:10:57
district and to create linkages and they um
00:11:02
are doing this by following the concept of transit oriented development um basically
00:11:09
through a boss rapid transit system um stops every few hundred meters though stops are used as
00:11:16
hops um burt they want to implement high density
00:11:19
i'm leaving a mixed and use um
00:11:23
normal tries transports read the cheese so everything basically into walking or cycling distance
00:11:31
no word that was the the two frosting from um so eventually that will then
00:11:37
i'm thirteen the whole crates they plant 'em all in this concept of uh
00:11:43
court or freedoms transit oriented development it a fairly well also
00:11:48
the first bus that actually went from subway talk to to central business district
00:11:53
got shot twice i think because they simply forgot about the taxi industry
00:11:59
they feared that um they would lose all passengers um and they now came up with a
00:12:05
quite sophisticated um compensation mechanisms are basically area via this p. r.
00:12:11
t. t. spots rapid transit system it is um compensating
00:12:14
the taxing history basin every kilometre that drive um the other
00:12:19
issue they had was the price for the tickets
00:12:22
it was for people living in some way tori was prohibitively high so nobody could actually
00:12:27
use it so they are trying to to um change that our rolling here
00:12:34
was a particular one um we were invited to write so
00:12:39
called thank ability study to see how ben couple actually
00:12:43
does your t. system as part of this transit oriented
00:12:46
development um approach would work um if chose not
00:12:53
yeah a technology that was very distinct technology caught you will
00:12:57
fuels on c. n. she's natural gas and diesel um
00:13:01
which is actually not to the market but them basic c. to implement at least to to first
00:13:06
faces so we did this bank ability start it then came to stop i must admit you
00:13:12
to corruption issues in the tendering process of the boss is um yeah but still we were
00:13:18
at least a people to to to bring our um former to the katrina mentioned too
00:13:24
two departments within the city of johannesburg and they're still
00:13:26
using it to ever wait and select their projects
00:13:31
then the second one um we've recently finished last year is a project in
00:13:37
cali to c. t. of uh in colombia um you can already forward
00:13:44
as you can see here the city has grown tremendously and
00:13:48
that of course puts pressure on um the infrastructure
00:13:52
but also on the communities as matter of fact in the city you have one either don't throw racetrack
00:13:59
pretty much dividing the city into rich and poor work those people of course uh not talking to each other on that track
00:14:06
you have a lot of informality going on um a lot
00:14:09
of crime as well um so they've chosen to create
00:14:15
what they called corridor developing a green cory door that actually uses the
00:14:19
zappa don't rail track for a complete city renewable um project
00:14:27
the idea um actually this idea was developed by gail architects you see here
00:14:33
to use this corridor or to unify the c. t. um
00:14:38
they shouldn't be just one track to should be should be
00:14:40
consisting of many many different projects links to each other
00:14:45
and this is where he'll architect work stopped um we
00:14:48
took this approach and developed it into let's say
00:14:52
if faced growth strategy and added concrete ideas on how
00:14:57
to also integrated community in this whole development
00:15:01
um how did we start with that um so well ultimately we came up
00:15:06
with the so called implementation plan which could be seen as a as
00:15:10
a priest h. two almost the plant because that was simply missing at
00:15:13
that time um if you could move on forward here you see
00:15:19
the city of golly and this is basically part of the green corridor it's almost twenty three kilometres long
00:15:25
so this is just one part and the interesting part because you here have a market courts
00:15:30
and uh uh elena and um this is a huge inform the market for you could buy pretty
00:15:37
much everything from um weapons to rocks but also or you're dating this is the necessities um
00:15:44
one yeah so these are just some some things on the green corridor or
00:15:48
so sometimes it's just we're three meters wide sometimes it's almost a hundred meters whites or i'm not one
00:15:54
chord thought it doesn't look the same uh everywhere um so what we did first of all
00:15:59
with the local implementation organisation we went on the streets and to um are
00:16:05
still around the thousand participants um how they feed into c. t.
00:16:09
you can move one forward this is just examples of what are the problems in your city
00:16:14
what are your desires you have towards the city and then
00:16:17
ultimately how could you screen cory door actually serve
00:16:21
to overcome the challenges that you have your daily life built on that we may be run some analyses
00:16:28
on let's say the landscape you could move one
00:16:30
former please um we simply napped infrastructure um
00:16:37
green spots bike routes that are already existing or plant um in
00:16:43
the second phase we looked at natural hazards like flopping
00:16:47
um earthquakes um and in areas that
00:16:50
would be um particularly um uh
00:16:56
oh
00:16:58
prone to to go with a catastrophic is hard at this isn't
00:17:02
actually what we ultimately came up review also looked at
00:17:05
uh at um traffic flows a little bit and so on so we suggested um um to start at the yellow
00:17:12
points let's say and tents that they let the screen corridor growth
00:17:16
so that it ultimately would unite into one one peak
00:17:19
a vision um we incorporated a lot these are just some
00:17:24
from the local implementation organisation how they actually see
00:17:27
see the green cory door at the end um you see also here not public transportation um
00:17:34
but we can integrate a lot of it's a community involvement approaches such as shared economy
00:17:40
approaches um we meaning to be suggested to introduce um
00:17:45
especially currency that could only be used at the screen corridor or
00:17:49
like impossibly have this kind of currency just to promote it
00:17:53
um and then we also made some suggestions although this is not
00:17:56
our field of expert ties are in order to um
00:18:01
get informal sector or closer that say to formal sector
00:18:06
so this is what we've done there we've we've referred written this uh
00:18:09
implementation plan and uh i'm currently they have taken up let's
00:18:14
say eighty percent of those id and trying to to really put them in place the last one and this is now
00:18:20
directly connecting to a sure standard um that
00:18:24
katrina presented besides assure standard we
00:18:27
we designed a it's a short version of the standard recorded smarts can
00:18:33
um which takes up exactly the same dimensions issues and everything um but justin
00:18:37
simplified matter so that they could really use by people um so
00:18:42
our colleague here louis was on the ground to grit unfortunate allowed to tell
00:18:47
you which he did actually is um he's been working in but
00:18:50
it does go back um it's around this the the mean by industry
00:18:57
corridor that is current current to be able to uh and um
00:19:01
there's the plan to build this c. t. let's say with if you ten thousand inhabitants that
00:19:06
basically serves the construction and during that time so this project is that design stage
00:19:13
some construction has started and get want each of our standard or the
00:19:17
smarts can actually is that it can be applied regardless of the
00:19:20
stage of an infrastructure project and it can be used to actually very
00:19:24
phi that want to just made during um to process so
00:19:29
louis sat down with the engineers with designers and evaluate it
00:19:36
the project as it was plant uh and i'm also evaluate to to um potential
00:19:43
areas of improvement so this is what comes out of the smart scan if you run through it
00:19:48
aunts all those questions to the dimensions incorrect here is that i'm catherine has shown to you
00:19:55
basically the the the dark blue area is the performance of
00:19:58
their particular project as as by the smarts again um
00:20:05
the red line is um a benchmark which is based on a few hundred projects
00:20:11
that we have our in our database cross sectoral um to to get
00:20:19
okay yep but basically we have a benchmark in it well um what with all um project
00:20:25
so you could compare also worldwide your performance in terms of use g. issues um then
00:20:32
we also half the light blue areas which all potential of improvements if
00:20:38
certain elements would um be considered so do we
00:20:43
then sit down with the engineers run through the smarts can identify
00:20:48
high performance areas in that particular city like about recycling day
00:20:52
thought of a very thorough they uh but also high um
00:20:55
risk areas and as a set um areas of improvement
00:20:59
i would just run very briefly through this um so there's been no vern is off and greenhouse gas emissions
00:21:07
convention your side so um it's a neck capacity building way you make me wear
00:21:12
off that and and showed way to to to mitigate that issue um
00:21:20
you could move on for this climate thing then on community
00:21:23
impact customer of inclusiveness um there has simply been
00:21:28
uh what the commissioning of the project simply has not been part of the plan so
00:21:34
we encourage planners project developers to think of that at the very beginning um i
00:21:39
think we have experts of circular economy here so they certainly understand um
00:21:45
there has been little engagement only with the industry um so we we showed
00:21:49
ways and means to actually include that into the process as well so
00:21:57
exactly so these are just three insights on very recent projects we've
00:22:01
been working on front two thousand fourteen until now um
00:22:06
i hope that you have seen that were actually pretty much talking about the same things um and hope that we can work
00:22:12
together in the future of course and now i hand over for last word out to katrina thank you very much
00:22:20
so now i thinking so what do we do now so and
00:22:25
as we're coming from that project level and i i do think we korean
00:22:30
lot of there and all of them pretty much all of the
00:22:33
what we call the sustainability and resilience issues i'm connected to infrastructure
00:22:39
which obviously all the connected to cities as a whole and
00:22:45
when we develop that the standard we had a lot of these criteria for cities
00:22:50
also implemented in the standard but in the process we find out we had to
00:22:54
draw the boundary better for the project so for some of these criteria um
00:23:02
for example um anything connectors city into connectivity
00:23:08
all our um then probably procurement these topics you
00:23:13
couldn't actually ask the project to do
00:23:16
they they had limited ways to win friends that to be
00:23:19
more sustainable and so we're coming up with the idea
00:23:23
of maybe doing um topic sectors supplement so that you have a version for it
00:23:30
infrastructure project is accompanied by a public sector set a supplement which could
00:23:36
i'm informed that this c. d. level of how to integrate existing of infrastructure in the
00:23:41
overall planning is one thing you want to look at and everybody important thing
00:23:48
would you have to do and the d. i. c. l. umbrella and is i
00:23:52
seal sustainability standards um framework i i. c. s. i. s. e. a. l.
00:24:00
i i see oh yeah but i says i seal it's um you know the third code is an impact assessment
00:24:09
i think this maybe also unites us a very much as we
00:24:14
we do all have very nice ideas about how we want to
00:24:18
introduce sustainability resilience but do we really know what happens
00:24:22
when the project and has been done do we really know it and how
00:24:26
many people actually have access to what it then or are how many
00:24:30
and jobs have been created to uh as i think that's it and major step and you know
00:24:35
something i think you could think about how do you measure you ideas you have great ideas
00:24:41
and they're great and if aesthetic and and um
00:24:46
generate sharing ideas but how the actually
00:24:49
measure them how do you assess the impact so does it need is
00:24:52
to next steps we're we want to look into anyway tasting the
00:24:57
them the standard still without project so we will have have one
00:25:01
in cost so we which we did with your notes together
00:25:04
and um we have this much skin assessments in in china india for
00:25:08
the moment image to south africa's soon and and we haven't switzerland
00:25:15
so we have a set of projects and we're testing it to the end of the year and then you stand on this is online

Share this talk: 


Conference program

PRÉSENTATION DE LA JOURNÉE DE SÉMINAIRE
Panos MANTZIARAS, Directeur, Fondation Braillard Architectes
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:10 a.m.
ALLOCUTION
Antonio HODGERS, Conseiller d’État chargé du département de l’aménagement, du logement et de l’énergie (DALE), République et canton de Genève
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:11 a.m.
INTRODUCTION
Panos MANTZIARAS, Directeur, Fondation Braillard Architectes
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:24 a.m.
ABRIS D’URGENCE À GENÈVE
Philippe BONHÔTE // Ivan VUARAMBON, Architecte, professeur, Joint Master of Architecture, HES/GE-HEPIA // Architecte, chargé de missions auprès de la DDC
8 Dec. 2016 · 9:46 a.m.
129 views
VIVRE DEMAIN LA VILLE DE BASSE DENSITÉ
Nicolas TIXIER // Jennifer BUYCK, Architecte, professeur, École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Grenoble // Architecte, maître de conférences, Institut d’urbanisme de Grenoble
8 Dec. 2016 · 10:15 a.m.
RÉPONDANTS : VIVRE DEMAIN LA VILLE DE BASSE DENSITÉ & ABRIS D’URGENCE À GENÈVE
Dominique BOURG // Rémi BAUDOUI, Philosophe, professeur - Institut de géographie et durabilité, Faculté des géosciences et de l’environnement, Université de Lausanne // Sociologue, professeur - Département de science politique et relations internationales, Université de Genève
8 Dec. 2016 · 10:44 a.m.
SUSTAINABLE AND RESILIENT URBAN INFRASTRUCTURES - INSIGHT FROM CASE STUDIES
Katharina SCHNEIDER ROSS // Marco GROSSMANN, Deputy Executive Director - Global Infrastructure Basel // Director Implementation Services - Global Infrastructure Basel
8 Dec. 2016 · 11:42 a.m.
PROJET ATLAS - ATLAS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE POUR L’ESPACE ALPIN
Peter DROEGE, Architect, professor, Liechtenstein Institute for Strategic Development
8 Dec. 2016 · 12:08 p.m.
RÉPONDANTS : PROJET ATLAS - ATLAS DE DÉVELOPPEMENT DURABLE POUR L’ESPACE ALPIN
Pascal ROLLET // Robert SADLEIR, Architecte, professeur, École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Grenoble // Économiste - Westminster University
8 Dec. 2016 · 12:35 p.m.
ATLAS ARCHITECTURAL D’ÉCONOMIES CIRCULAIRES
Grégoire BIGNIER // Peggy GARCIA, Architecte-ingénieur, chercheur, Laboratoire LIAT, ENSAPM // Architecte, postgrade EPFL - Maître assistant associé, ENSAPM
8 Dec. 2016 · 2:52 p.m.
108 views
SCENARIOS FOR A COLLABORATIVE CITY SUSTAINABLE UTOPIA OF THE POLYCENTRIC RUHR REGION
Alexander SCHMIDT, Architecte, professor - Institute of City Planning + Urban Design, University Duisburg-Essen
8 Dec. 2016 · 3:18 p.m.
RÉPONDANTS : SCENARIOS FOR A COLLABORATIVE CITY SUSTAINABLE UTOPIA OF THE POLYCENTRIC RUHR REGION
Sabine BARLES // Gunther VOGT, Ingenieure, professeure - Universite Paris I, UMR Geo-Cites // Paysagiste, professeur?Institut fur Landschaftsarchitektur, ETHZ
8 Dec. 2016 · 3:49 p.m.
URBAN LIFE FOR SUBURBIA - THE TICINO CASE
Frédéric BONNET, Architecte, professeur - Académie d’architecture, Mendrisio
8 Dec. 2016 · 5:10 p.m.
ALPS - PROTOTYPES FOR THE ALPINE CITY-TERRITORY
PAOLA VIGANÒ, Architecte-urbaniste, professeure EPFL et IUAV, directrice du laboratoire Lab-U/ EPFL, membre fondateur de l’agence Studio 16, Milan
8 Dec. 2016 · 5:43 p.m.
140 views
RÉPONDANTS : DENSUISSE - RECHERCHE PROSPECTIVE SUR LA DENSIFICATION DE L’ESPACE URBAIN SUISSE
Pascal ROLLET // Günther VOGT, Architecte, professeur, École nationale supérieure d’architecture de Grenoble // Paysagiste, professeur Institut für Landschaftsarchitektur, ETHZ
8 Dec. 2016 · 6:13 p.m.
CONFÉRENCE / KEYNOTE SPEECH // CURRENT PREOCCUPATIONS
Reinier DE GRAAF, Architect - Office for Metropolitan Architecture, Rotterdam 8 DÉCEMBRE 2016
8 Dec. 2016 · 6:39 p.m.
QUESTIONS // REPONSES
Reinier DE GRAAF, Architect - Office for Metropolitan Architecture, Rotterdam 8 DÉCEMBRE 2016
8 Dec. 2016 · 7:21 p.m.

Recommended talks

Scenarios for a collaborative city - sustainable utopia of the polycentric ruhr
Alexander SCHMIDT, Architecte, professor - Institute of City Planning + Urban Design, University Duisburg-Essen
30 Nov. 2017 · 3:21 p.m.
Bühler Group
Peter C. Böhni
18 May 2016 · 4:07 p.m.
283 views