Player is loading...

Embed

Copy embed code

Transcriptions

Note: this content has been automatically generated.
00:00:00
you know the press a manual in the surgery department into shoes or who actually a
00:00:06
challenge a little bit the boundary of a raise action happen to select casino which is uh
00:00:11
longer discussion mostly coming from is yeah but i was very pleased to see that's a
00:00:16
yeah also some data from europe things so you weren't so ah we we'll uh we'll
00:00:22
why on your form ah you already did me that he than
00:00:26
the amount of the price and we have a pitcher that we can
00:00:40
yeah we're not so now you have the chance to show last summer the
00:00:44
new results thank you very much and go recognition again for your price thing too
00:00:49
thank you uh very much for this kinda introduction
00:00:53
to yeah uh president here uh participant's uh it's
00:00:57
a great pleasure and honour um to present today
00:01:01
this project which was um selected for the yearly
00:01:05
price price sorry we listen to many uh speakers
00:01:09
well known and prestige you speakers how ever i
00:01:12
guess not many people in the room uh you know who i am so please let me introduce myself
00:01:18
in a few words um i i attended medical
00:01:22
university in lausanne switzerland and five book implies gal
00:01:26
germany i got my uh mm mm doctorate in madison in two thousand a seventeen
00:01:33
then i was a board certified in general surgery in two thousand
00:01:37
nineteen and i was awarded private doesn't at the university of frozen into
00:01:42
talent i worked in several a hospital but many at issue even less than
00:01:47
and at the yet she mortgage which is a small a hospital
00:01:51
just next to design a beautiful place just next to the lake
00:01:55
i went through a different surgical specialities but mainly
00:02:00
general surgery h. p. b. surgery and transplant
00:02:02
surgery i uh just recently completed a fifteen
00:02:06
months a fellowship at the royal infirmary net and randy you kate uh in transplant surgery
00:02:13
including will jog and ritual across all over the country was uh
00:02:17
very great experience enriching experience a lot of whiskey hockey's and it's
00:02:22
a great pleasure uh so you probably know a that a manual
00:02:28
it's made with this one of my bus one of my a mentor hissed a medical
00:02:34
ad director of to a live in progress a centre which was built approximately two years
00:02:40
ago he's very involved on a institution level but also
00:02:45
on a national level and international level he's involved in the
00:02:49
u. h. p. b. uh society he's experience skewed in
00:02:53
many well in basically ramping critics surgery and has that
00:02:56
research interest in either a pancreatic oncology and
00:03:00
uh the rest which is enhanced recovery after um
00:03:05
surgery so uh and not about us that was a bit to the
00:03:09
boring part for you let's talk about the project so as previously discussed
00:03:14
the management of h. e. c. must be a multi disciplinary
00:03:19
does that a lot of key players in the management including
00:03:23
right eulogy is either a intervention all a diagnostic pathologies to have but
00:03:28
uh just of course oncologist surgeons and it's uh of course we all
00:03:33
work together in order to improve a patient outcome but it's maybe one
00:03:38
of the issues in the uh that's too but the case is that every
00:03:42
a member of the team has become highly uh specialise in its
00:03:46
own uh fields there are many ways of treating patients from intentional point
00:03:52
of view there are a lot of difference a systemic treatment we saw
00:03:56
it in the previous presentation uh we need information from the apologies so
00:04:02
everything has become more and more a complex ants um one of the question
00:04:07
is what is the role of the of the surgeons in h. e. c. management
00:04:12
so it's talk a a bit more about these aspects because in fact as you know
00:04:17
the b. c. c. guidelines which where uh develop them published in the late nineties were um
00:04:24
developed by have pathologist ends at the time they were published
00:04:29
the uh rule of a surgical rejection was not a very important and only
00:04:36
considered for very early stage orally um stage b. c. l. c. um patience
00:04:43
white pace was suggested for for intermediate stage however
00:04:48
couldn't we reject more of these uh these yes should be patient so intermediate
00:04:54
stage and could we spend their uh could tear yep so it is very interesting
00:04:59
paper a publishing and out of habit energy into those and a sixteen
00:05:03
and it really the focus of the the fall of the burn a team
00:05:09
only twenty nine of person of the p. c. s. t. b. patients were treated according to the other
00:05:16
it which is very very low and meaning that the vast majority of the patients are not treated um
00:05:22
correctly according to the to the algorithm so our group in
00:05:26
design we uh did this uh i met analysis including seven
00:05:31
trials more than one thousand seven hundred patients seven hundred fifty
00:05:35
have protected me is at nine hundred tapes and we show
00:05:38
actually that the survival after have protected me was significantly trees
00:05:42
fifty three months of verses twenty eight amounts for four days
00:05:48
so we we challenged it's this this um other it and even
00:05:53
the two thousand twenty to update uh i didn't improve much um
00:05:58
from the surgical point of view and there's no line uh going to the intermediate stage
00:06:04
uh here to the of lever is action
00:06:09
so this is the um project which received a price this year to my
00:06:13
burden patients with early any intermediate stage h. t. c. undergoing leave it was action
00:06:19
it was a rich respective study a mighty sentry can't
00:06:23
things to that on the news net work we were
00:06:26
able to uh collaborate with the mount sinai hospital in
00:06:30
new york levitate beaches but separate here in in paris france
00:06:35
and the uh the pretended well your from the hospice either you
00:06:39
so just a aim was to assess clinical outcomes and overall survival of p. c. s. c. a. n. b. patients
00:06:46
that's underwent leaders action in to compare these two groups using except classification to melbourne score
00:06:53
um so this is our methods retrospective uh as say before
00:06:59
all consecutive patient that underwent events action uh
00:07:02
between twenty ten and twenty twenty in these four
00:07:06
raffle centres and experience in a cheesy management where included by definition b.
00:07:12
j. c. stage a patients work signal uh h. c. c. including single
00:07:18
large which are sometimes put in a b. c. c. b. stitch in
00:07:22
in studies so we include it's single large as well in the stage
00:07:27
o. r. h. e. c. less or equal the three no dues all the so
00:07:30
called in three uh centimetres while the the city stage be where where only regional dealer
00:07:37
including pretty yeah we're at right logical diagnosis of h. t. c.s no that's great invasion
00:07:42
please you have the the function and that performance s. is you got off zero
00:07:49
the tuner buttons core t. b. s. has been uh original described for the
00:07:54
uh management of colour rectal lever my test as is and it's um included
00:08:00
the number of the of the tuner subdivisions ends to size usually have to be used um
00:08:07
lesion and the group of of timit to politics from the us they
00:08:11
use it for h. e. c. and the publish it the first time in in
00:08:15
two thousand and twenty in the b. g. s. and stay a separate it's the patients
00:08:21
three stages slow tedious medium t. b. s. and how to be as depending on the
00:08:26
two minute a burden so this is our uh uh courts six hundred twelve patients overall
00:08:34
five hundred sixty two b. c. c. a. a only unfortunately fifty patients indivisible be group
00:08:41
they were beats a younger a significantly however there was no difference in terms of sex
00:08:47
b. m. i. as a score um alcohol
00:08:50
can conceptions smoking a co morbidity stay betters
00:08:55
interestingly approximately a third of the patients hat uh see
00:08:59
roses but no difference between the two groups no difference
00:09:02
in terms of uh h. u. h. t. v. air infections and of course the vast majority of the patient had
00:09:08
child have a a great almost a hundred percent actually
00:09:13
logically that patients into b. c. s. c. p. group heights a higher number of
00:09:20
lesions and a higher size of the biggest
00:09:23
lesions and therefore logically as well a higher
00:09:27
two more borden score they also had a higher and number of three uh
00:09:33
operative case procedures because uh approximately a
00:09:37
half of them had had days before rejection
00:09:42
this is a a surgical um and clinical outcome so it's
00:09:47
in that patients ways uh intermediate stage uh h. u. c.
00:09:52
uh and they went more complex surgery because they
00:09:56
underwent more had protect i mean a a less minimally
00:10:00
invasive surgery only sixteen percent operative time was longer more
00:10:05
bought loss and a more of a a blood transfusion
00:10:11
interestingly there was no difference in overall complication
00:10:17
um even if they have significantly more major complication but overall rate was not statistically different
00:10:24
and snow difference as well in terms of mortality approximately one
00:10:27
two percent which is a comparable to the the church or
00:10:31
and in terms of a specific complications to lever surgery there
00:10:36
was no difference in pa stop societies by the cage or
00:10:41
even faded however to had a a slightly uh increased
00:10:44
overall uh things of stay searching the verses ten days
00:10:48
it's a format pathological point of you know difference at
00:10:53
yeah and in differing change grades uh info basket invasion
00:10:57
and sorry ants are zero margin in it which was a between eight four ninety percent
00:11:05
um let's talk about the interesting port overall survival so of course if we
00:11:11
compare a busy i see a patient there's just b. c. s. e. b. altogether
00:11:16
this is evasion had a statistically significant uh increased
00:11:21
survival you was even and define because it interest of fifty person line
00:11:26
a and b. c. c. b. patient hadn't were also whatever fifty seven months
00:11:31
if we compare them now in terms of t. b. yes so tomb brenda score
00:11:37
uh these yes yeah a patient purses be with
00:11:40
location again here to b. c. c. patient had increased
00:11:44
so variable however didn't have much uh patients in this group but it's this is important
00:11:51
now if we take the b. c. s. shape patient versus b. but with medium
00:11:56
and high t. b. s. then um the
00:12:00
survivor was not statistically a different so uh
00:12:07
and and same for disease free survival again if we take the b. c. i see
00:12:10
a patient a a significantly a high year
00:12:14
for a eleven months verses five point nine months
00:12:20
uh this is for survival same as before if we compare according to the low
00:12:26
t. b. s. there was a an increased survival for that a patient but again
00:12:31
for the medium t. b. s. if we compare a. b. medium and a. b.
00:12:36
hi t. b. s. there was no uh increased and no statistic
00:12:42
difference in terms of um survivor so this is an important but i think we'll discuss it after
00:12:50
uh we did also a nutty very cox regression
00:12:54
isaiah is the analysis with i can put it to
00:12:57
integrate one um but it's if we talked a statistically
00:13:01
significant can generate input in this model the only factor
00:13:05
that's a remained a that prick picture of
00:13:09
of over survival was major possibilities complication for
00:13:12
the a group and it's um may sex for to be group so overall into court to
00:13:19
t. b. s. core had no influence if we and as it like uh this mystery cox regression
00:13:27
it's interesting question as well i seems uh what is that
00:13:32
correlation between that pathological humid written score
00:13:36
uh and the red logical to melbourne score
00:13:39
because uh if we think about the b. c. s. jaeger in almost
00:13:42
every decision is based on you may gene and and we asked tests
00:13:48
and compare this to the uh apology guises and actually it's very very good
00:13:53
the collisions very strong reason are quite efficient
00:13:56
of zero point uh it turned fifty three beaches
00:13:59
very good so imaging exert rial will uh and tooling
00:14:03
we should use it in in a a treatment based decision
00:14:09
of course there are a lot of limitation of this
00:14:12
thirty two trees retrospective design and it uses selection bias
00:14:18
taste before surgery well we can assess tomorrow viability on a imaging
00:14:25
what about preserved lever function um almost all of our patient had that
00:14:29
preserve liver function but we should assess each in future in the other patients wheeze wheeze uh
00:14:36
'tis deeper function which is not preserved when assets several important factors a f. p. uh eventually
00:14:43
i'm pretty systemic therapies and it's uh we didn't
00:14:47
have a control group let's say yes standard control
00:14:51
group to challenge the surgical cohorts i'm
00:14:55
against tastes or even um your transportation
00:15:00
our does our conclusion a cheesy patient with medium and high humour brenda score
00:15:06
t. b. s. had that comparable survival after surgery irrespective of decency stage
00:15:13
t. b. s. could be a recommended for progress to
00:15:16
predication and management we quit imagine using eighteen to melbourne
00:15:21
uh ensure board sorry uh or even in future trial so we think that a refinement of p. c. s.
00:15:27
c. a stage might be required in order to uh
00:15:31
locates best treatment and select patients who might benefit from surgery
00:15:38
and at the time of the paper focus so before they even recommended that burn
00:15:42
clinically are cancer where if you watch much more interesting for surgeons because we uh who
00:15:48
uh rejects and suggest was actions for uh intermediate stage patients so that's it thank you
00:15:54
very much for you um attention and again thank you very much capacity for for you kind
00:16:00
invitation and at this price it's a hundred things to tell mabel fall he's report
00:16:05
he was the leader of this uh project and he wasn't a funny adventure thank you
00:16:11
the traditions day well presented do we have any questions you have a certain hum
00:16:25
oh sorry i
00:16:30
thank you very much my name is on yeah and ah my from than i have a couple of questions actually
00:16:34
i'm very importance today i agree totally agree it's too rigid the p. c. and v. and it's important to yeah
00:16:41
may cross section more important and i think that what's
00:16:44
retrospective that fifty patients that were p. c. l. c. b.
00:16:48
and where where they know to be peace l. c. b. before them essential what that
00:16:52
occurrence identifying where there were so they were operated beyond features secret or that was interesting
00:16:58
point and nice in almost every respect study uh included in the mountain rises yeah my
00:17:04
second question would be a interns that indication for transplantation because i think the most important yeah
00:17:10
uh_huh and the way to go for sections to get more information about the
00:17:15
two married to be able to find the right patients for transplantation did teal
00:17:20
analysts they do we think we have micro vascular invasion for
00:17:23
example in creating and how that impacted your indication for transportation
00:17:28
uh no so the witness as a debt you know then we're not a liver transplant
00:17:34
centre but we work closely with chain around we discussed this kind of uh of course
00:17:38
of course liver transplant has a a huge role to play in
00:17:41
this kind of position and see if we think intermediate stage um
00:17:45
most of them and the work and the go um to sprint to the bit in several centres in
00:17:50
a lot of different countries cases you there's a breach to transplant surgery where the on the waiting list
00:17:57
so this is something of course we need to assess that criteria
00:18:01
i don't know if per news that a man should therefore for
00:18:05
yeah in the u. k. for example where worked so even
00:18:08
these criteria it out much more um favour before surgery because
00:18:13
the uh the size of the trimmer bigger and a number of the size allowed to undergo divergence from a much higher
00:18:19
um so i think there's a lot of work to do from this point of
00:18:23
view but that's the main uh intuition of just to do weaknesses lever transplant at all
00:18:29
and uh probably a few patients especially from the new york
00:18:31
teen that under one sale h. transparent after a breeze action yet
00:18:37
witnesses that and did you look at the degree of portal hypertension how many patients had invasive measurements of
00:18:43
uh we did try to get that that that that it was not very successful
00:18:48
and um i guess not many people
00:18:50
especially in france had is a systematic meter
00:18:55
before it's uh do you do this routinely before the surgery if we go for
00:18:58
for surgery for niches you'd be of course we'd we'd systematically routine in those and
00:19:04
if i may one ask one final question and i i really i thought you had ten thirteen days of half
00:19:10
does which is quite long in particular with the the resin
00:19:13
minds that is that what is your typical length of stay
00:19:17
ah well if we think four and h. e. c.
00:19:21
b. major have protect them yeah i would say between it
00:19:25
we just ten days is something a standard of
00:19:29
course if we uh speak about uh which procedure
00:19:33
or what they do when not much minimally invasive i'm here in this case icing alright approximately
00:19:39
is around twenty twenty five percent of of a prescriptive prosody wasn't the same in the other centres
00:19:45
but i would say minimally invasive forward per student in should be three
00:19:49
four days maximum so probably a manual has a something to it is for
00:19:54
but the rest is working very well for years action i know i agree we
00:19:59
should the the the low speed test is a bit longer but we start to the
00:20:05
the guidance see the stout uh wasn't the first gayness will either
00:20:08
went to doesn't sixteen and we have patient before so two thousand sixteen
00:20:13
and probably also for security patient the current guidelines have
00:20:17
to be updated force you to patients so that's probably one
00:20:20
also the should uh i think we can do it in three four days we can look at it together yeah
00:20:29
how is you uh sorry if i may ask you a question my turn
00:20:32
as experience and and what are the results with this lever a transplant for
00:20:37
your your patients and i don't know if you have any that down on
00:20:40
intermediate stage underwent lever transportation because if if we think about that a new
00:20:47
included for the the transplants on techniques plants analysis of delivered is usually much more
00:20:54
lesions that what was present on on preamp imaging e. v. even if we show
00:20:58
that equation was cool on the whole explained start usually much more so they wear
00:21:03
the yawns young creature i've precinct yeah i mean in the end we
00:21:08
if we stay within me done we have like a ten percent and
00:21:12
recurrence rate i know the data from the f. t. c. s. the
00:21:14
recurrence made for h. t. c. after liver transplantation we have eleven percent
00:21:20
yeah i it's it's very obvious as soon as we expand the criteria
00:21:24
yeah yeah no matter in what way the recurrence rate goes up to sell
00:21:29
it's a very difficult thing we do a lot of down staging a budget we have the long
00:21:33
waiting time and again these are the patients that have more occurrences if they were aggressively down staged
00:21:41
okay thank you
00:21:43
i thank you very much thank you for your presentation in for the
00:21:47
interesting discussion thank you so we move now to our next a speaker
00:21:53
who is also basin californian we have that great pleasure to have with us
00:21:58
apart as a major thing with american colleges you guessed want to e. g.
00:22:03
is a basin you see only as you can see nice weather had a chat
00:22:10
and um he's a principal investigators on many
00:22:13
uh important to tia trials in the field
00:22:16
ah has published extensively on hypnotist that i can see no man hath in these uh
00:22:22
really the best to speak ill could indicators on a face to ongoing
00:22:28
and try as inhabit is i guess human face to thank you very much which are to be with us today
00:22:36
but are you very we hear you know raw
00:22:39
very nice introduction raw my background is break but rather is
00:22:44
very nice ra ra ra who or where there where you are
00:22:48
but that that's another or if you're not sure appreciate
00:22:51
are we not sure it's cruel well you know now or
00:22:56
will it be with you to a although ah extra
00:23:02
rules could we pursue you know our ground or on the
00:23:07
topic a little bit uh on drugs and this is
00:23:12
a huge topic ah i do see er lu era concerts
00:23:19
or what's going on uh working just great work you know
00:23:22
sir no it's it's just great ah was an orphan disease
00:23:27
or your when i start it on a regular drawbridge oh
00:23:30
sure you know you re really was nothing going on oh
00:23:35
here you know do we agree answers around where did you

Share this talk: 


Conference Program

Welcome
Jean-François Dufour, Berne
Feb. 29, 2024 · 2 p.m.
How to select systemic therapy for HCC
A. Saborowski
Feb. 29, 2024 · 2:05 p.m.
Recipient Prize
D. Martin
Feb. 29, 2024 · 4 p.m.
New Agents in Development for HCC
R. Finn
Feb. 29, 2024 · 4:30 p.m.
Closing Remarks
Jean-François Dufour, Berne
Feb. 29, 2024 · 5:30 p.m.